Central & Modern 2BR Apt, 4min Subway to Oslo City vs Similar Hotels

Generally positive sentiments; however, some complaints about the bed and space.

Rooms are spacious and include kitchen appliances but are described as old, with hard beds and sometimes poor temperature control (no AC) — functional but dated.

Mixed feedback on room quality; some found it spacious while others reported unpleasant smells.

Rooms were described as spacious and modern, but some mentioned a lack of decoration.

The apartment was reported to be unhygienic and dirty, particularly the kitchen and bathroom.

Multiple reviews mention unclean bathrooms, hairs and strange stains, insects on the bathroom floor despite clean bed linen in some rooms — overall cleanliness is below standard.

Several reviews highlighted issues with cleanliness, such as dirty rooms and unpleasant odors.

Multiple reviews mentioned issues such as dust and unclean common areas.

The apartment is centrally located and close to metro stations, making it convenient.

Consistently praised: very close to the metro, parks, supermarkets and bakery; convenient access to the city centre and local amenities.

Multiple reviews praised the great location, near bars, restaurants, and major attractions.

Numerous reviews praised the excellent location near attractions.

The host was responsive in offering a cleaner and attentive to requests.

Service is inconsistent: several guests report no on-site reception and phone-based remote handling (impersonal, sometimes rude), while a few note helpful staff who assisted with luggage.

Overall supportive staff, though there were some complaints about the response to maintenance issues.

Responsive service regarding elevator issues and overall satisfaction expressed in reviews.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

No consistent on-site F&B service mentioned; nearby bakeries/shops available — default rating applied where category is not discussed in reviews.

Positive mentions about local cafe but limited comments on broader food options.

Not explicitly mentioned, so defaulted to target rating.

The apartment was well-equipped with necessary facilities.

Good basic amenities such as kitchen, washer and parking availability in principle; however guests note missing small supplies (toiletries, cleaning tools), parking condition issues and occasional unclean utensils.

Inconsistencies in kitchen and bathroom amenities were noted, such as lack of utensils and poor cleanliness.

Reviews pointed out missing kitchen tools and equipment, affecting convenience.

Perceived as a decent option with good features for the price.

Several guests explicitly mention the property being good value for money and reasonably priced for city access; despite some extra fees/deposit complaints, overall perceived as strong value.

Generally perceived as good value given the central location despite some issues.

Guests found it to be a good value based on location and size.