Faenza 18, a cozy apartment vs Similar Hotels

Minor negative: ongoing renovation caused drilling noise. Guest notes this is not the accommodation's fault and drilling began after 08:00.

Rooms were described as comfortable but some outdated.

Rooms often described as spacious, nicely decorated and larger than photos, with good A/C; some minor issues noted (tight gap by bed, high windows with no view) but overall strong quality.

The rooms are modern and comfortable, although some noise issues were noted.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Several mentions of cleanliness being good, but issues with soundproofing impacted the overall score.

Generally praised as very clean and 'superrent' in many reviews, though a few mention bathroom cleaning issues and one comment about general dirtiness—overall slightly below perfect.

Though generally clean, some reviews mentioned noise disturbances and cleanliness in relation to noise levels.

Not mentioned explicitly, but overall praise suggests a very positive location impression; rating slightly increased to balance a lower room score.

Location is frequently highlighted as excellent, near popular areas.

Consistently highlighted as excellent/very central/close to metro and restaurants in many reviews; location is a strong positive across listings.

The hotel is centrally located but is noisy due to surrounding nightlife.

Guest reports 'everything great' and recommends the stay; service is presumed above standard and slightly increased to compensate for a minor issue noted with the room (balancing).

The service received high praise in multiple reviews for being friendly and helpful.

Mixed reports: several guests praised clear communication and quick issue handling, but multiple mentions of lack of on-site staff, slow or no response at times, check-in access confusion and one report of fraudulent behavior lowered this score.

Most reviews praised the friendly and helpful staff consistently.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast was consistently praised for its quality and variety.

Several guests complained that breakfast is not served in the building (served at a café) and that this was not communicated in advance; this gap lowered the F&B score.

Breakfast options received high praise, despite some mentions of disorganization.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Amenities were included in positive sentiments, although some reviews mentioned areas for improvement.

Laundry facilities, good A/C and quality shower products were appreciated; negatives include very poor internet for some, lack of dishes/cookware and few hangers.

Facilities and amenities are well-rated, though some minor concerns about breakfast organization were mentioned.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Value is generally considered good, despite some complaints about pricing and charges.

Multiple guests noted the stay was 'well worth it' or 'todo perfecto' and recommended the property, indicating strong perceived value overall despite some operational shortcomings.

Standard for this hotel tier, providing good value but with room for slight improvements.