Botánica Hotel Manila by HOUSY vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were reported as small with some noise issues and a lack of ventilation.

Some feedback on room design shortcomings; small toilet and layout issues.

Rooms were noted to be comfortable and well-designed, though some were smaller than expected.

Rooms are modern and stylish with comfortable beds for many visitors, but multiple comments mention small bathrooms, overly hard beds for some, bright illuminated screens, and occasional maintenance/cleanliness issues.

The room was clean upon arrival, but there were complaints about room cleaning not being done during the stay.

Mixed sentiments; some cleanliness issues mentioned such as black mold and stains.

Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, notably the presence of cockroaches.

Generally reported as clean (several reviews note clean rooms and good housekeeping) but isolated serious issues (dirty grates near bathtub, reported condom wrappers) reduce the score slightly.

The location is ideal, close to bars, restaurants, and supermarkets.

Excellent location with good access to attractions and safety.

The hotel location was frequently praised as very convenient, close to restaurants and metro stations.

Consistently described as central/privileged with easy access to restaurants/nightlife and walkable areas; strong plus for many guests. Noise from the surrounding nightlife and some safety perceptions at night are recurring negatives.

Staff was friendly and accommodating, but there were issues with the morning receptionist.

General positivity towards staff service; particularly friendly and professional.

Service was highlighted positively in multiple reviews, particularly the commendation for Luisa's exceptional hospitality.

Staff repeatedly praised as very friendly and professional (breakfast staff, reception, guards, housekeeping). A few reports of poor front-desk service and one transfer/security scare are noted but uncommon.

Breakfast was good, but options for it should be included in the stay.

Concerns about the quality and presentation of breakfast.

Breakfast options were mentioned as needing improvement, although it was still enjoyed by some.

Mixed but generally positive: some rave about delicious breakfasts and rooftop food/atmosphere, while others call the breakfast low quality or overpriced and note a limited rooftop menu.

Amenities such as breakfast and 24-hour reception were appreciated.

Mixed feedback; while amenities like the pool were appreciated, there were complaints on the lack of a dining table and poor soundproofing.

Amenities were generally appreciated, but there were occasional mentions of wifi issues.

Rooftop, bars and restaurant atmosphere are frequently praised and the hotel offers modern facilities (white-noise machines, good Wi‑Fi). Minor operational issues (rooftop access procedure) slightly limit perfection.

Overall good value for the price, despite some inconveniences.

Generally viewed as good value, but some issues affect perception.

The overall experience was considered good value for the price, reflecting satisfaction with accommodations.

Several guests mention good value and reasonable pricing, but complaints about an expensive/underwhelming breakfast and a few service hiccups pull this down.