
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
9.1Rooms were noted as new and clean, but some issues with ventilation reported.
Cleanliness
8.6The reviews mention issues with damp smell and drainage problems in some rooms.
Location
10.0Multiple reviews praised the central and convenient location.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.




What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
Winaka Ubud
9.1/10KT. Kuaya Home Stay
8.5/10Goutama Homestay
9.2/10Dewangga Ubud
8.9/10Winaka Ubud
8.4Generally comfortable rooms but some issues regarding shower pressure.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
7.3Room sizes varied, with some guests noting small and damp rooms.
Goutama Homestay
9.1Rooms were noted as new and clean, but some issues with ventilation reported.
Dewangga Ubud
8.8Rooms appreciated for being spacious and comfortable, though some noted varying quality.
Winaka Ubud
8.5The cleanliness was mostly good, but there were concerns about bad odors in some areas.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
7.9Several comments mentioned issues with odours in the room and dirty bathroom items.
Goutama Homestay
8.6The reviews mention issues with damp smell and drainage problems in some rooms.
Dewangga Ubud
8.3Some reviews mentioned the need for better cleaning and dated facilities.
Winaka Ubud
9.5The location is praised for being central and quiet, with easy access to attractions.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
9.4Multiple reviews highlighted a great location, central yet quiet.
Goutama Homestay
10.0Multiple reviews praised the central and convenient location.
Dewangga Ubud
9.8Multiple reviews praised the central location and easy access to amenities.
Winaka Ubud
10.0Staff were described as very nice, helpful, and friendly.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
9.4Overall, guests praised the staff's friendliness and helpfulness.
Goutama Homestay
9.6Staff was described as wonderful and accommodating.
Dewangga Ubud
9.3Staff were frequently described as friendly and attentive.
Winaka Ubud
—KT. Kuaya Home Stay
—Goutama Homestay
—Dewangga Ubud
—Winaka Ubud
8.5Breakfast was basic but sufficient; some variety might improve it.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
7.9Breakfast quality was mentioned as average in some reviews, with suggestions for improvement.
Goutama Homestay
8.1Breakfast was described as not very good despite being included.
Dewangga Ubud
8.8Breakfast options were well-received, contributing positively to stay experiences.
Winaka Ubud
9.5Amenities like the pool received positive feedback.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
8.4Amenities were generally good but some guests suggested additional items would improve the experience.
Goutama Homestay
9.1Amenities mentioned included breakfast and a pool, but some aspects could be improved.
Dewangga Ubud
8.8The breakfast was highlighted positively, though some amenities were noted as dated.
Winaka Ubud
8.9Reasonably priced for the quality offered.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
8.8Value perceived as decent considering the pricing and location.
Goutama Homestay
9.6Overall great value for the price, as mentioned in positive reviews.
Dewangga Ubud
8.2Good value was mentioned, but there were complaints about noise due to construction.
Winaka Ubud
Cap Bagong TattooKT. Kuaya Home Stay
Puri Saren AgungGoutama Homestay
Ida Tjokorda Gde Agung SukawatiDewangga Ubud
Ida Tjokorda Gde Agung Sukawati