basement residence vs Similar Hotels

Quiet and clean; overall decent quality.

Some reviews mentioned room quality positively, but there were complaints about cleanliness and maintenance.

Multiple complaints about small rooms/bed size, cramped sala layout, cleanliness issues in rooms (hair, dust), and soundproofing problems. Some guests liked the room views, but room size and cleanliness complaints lower this score.

Rooms and apartments described as spacious and comfortable, but recurring issues: some suites lack a bedroom door/separator, occasional humidity and kitchen below expectations in some units.

Dirty all over.

Multiple reviews indicated issues with cleanliness, including dirty carpets and bathrooms.

Mixed reports: several guests complained of poor cleaning (hair on floor, bad odors in toilets, general low cleanliness), while some reviews explicitly praised room cleanliness. Overall leans negative due to multiple reports of unclean rooms and smells.

Generally described as very clean and well maintained in multiple reviews; isolated issues noted (humid room, wet floor on arrival).

Noisy neighbors and can’t walk anywhere.

The location was frequently cited as a positive aspect, well-situated for guests.

Several guests highlighted an excellent, central location and good views. Location and outlook are consistently cited as strong points.

Convenient central location, quiet setting and within walking distance of the metro — repeatedly mentioned positively.

All was okay; positive mention of service.

Most reviews praised the staff for being helpful and polite, despite some criticisms.

Generally very positive: staff described as great, prompt and professional; service praised repeatedly. Some operational issues (staff unaware about TV port differences) noted but do not outweigh mostly strong service feedback.

Consistently praised staff (many named) for friendliness and helpfulness at check-in/out; some reports of staff shortages, slow room/pool service and a refused restaurant request.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Food quality received favorable comments, enhancing the overall experience.

Food generally praised: buffet and dining received strong positive mentions and compliments to the chef, though vegetarian options are limited for some guests.

Several comments about limited breakfast variety and lower-quality dinner options; specific incident of inflexible restaurant policy also noted.

No washer or cooker.

Amenities received mixed feedback, with some complaints but also positive mentions.

Amenities (pool, general residence facilities) are appreciated by some guests, but there are notes about distance between rooms and pool, elevator placement, and inconsistent in-room equipment (e.g., HDMI ports on TVs).

Rooftop pool and other amenities are appreciated; pool and pool furniture need better maintenance and some units lacked expected fixtures (e.g., bath).

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Value for money perceived positively, though some found it overpriced for the quality.

Mixed perceptions: some guests feel the stay is worth the money and comfortable, while others cite high price relative to room size and amenities. Overall slightly above neutral.

Multiple guests commented on excellent price and good overall value for the offering.