Premier Inn London Greenwich vs Similar Hotels

Beds and showers often praised (comfortable mattresses, good showers) and good soundproofing in many rooms; some reports of saggy beds, little storage and varying noise for rooms near the station.

Rooms reported as spacious with good design and well-equipped bathrooms by many guests; some issues with air conditioning performance and occasional maintenance faults slightly reduce the score.

Some rooms small and temperature issues reported.

Generally spacious and comfortable, some temperature issues noted.

Rooms frequently described as clean and tidy with good showers, but a number of guests reported bathroom cleanliness issues (limescale on shower head) and limited in-room storage.

Mixed reports: several guests praise clean rooms and bathrooms, while at least one review describes very poor cleanliness in WC/shower; overall slightly below target due to those negative reports.

Generally clean and warm; some issues with room readiness for breakfast.

Some cleanliness issues mentioned, but overall decent.

Consistently praised as central and convenient (near station, walking distance to centre); a few guests reported noise from station announcements depending on room placement.

Located on an industrial estate: convenient for driving and public transport links (bus stop nearby) but criticized for being somewhat remote from the town centre and on a main road; overall location sentiment is mixed-to-negative.

Great location, easy access to central London and local attractions.

Consistently praised as ideal and convenient location.

Multiple mentions of kind, friendly and helpful staff at reception; some staffing shortages noted and at least one report of poor service/organisation of breakfast.

Staff frequently described as friendly and helpful across reviews; some maintenance requests were not resolved but general service interactions are positive, supporting an above-average score.

Excellent service as noted by multiple reviewers, especially from Sharma.

Staff generally friendly, but some service reductions noted.

Breakfast is frequently described as very good or delicious, but recurring issues with insufficient seating in the breakfast area and limited fresh fruit/variety were mentioned.

Breakfast is repeatedly described as very good and plentiful; limited restaurant menu and occasional crowding at peak times are minor negatives but overall F&B (especially breakfast) is a strong point.

Breakfast considered excellent; other food experiences vary.

Breakfast and kitchen options were points of dissatisfaction.

Basic amenities present (parking, air conditioning, toiletries noted) but guests reported issues: A/C off at night, few EV chargers, no conditioner/tissues in some rooms, no mini-fridge and limited parking availability/cost.

Breakfast offering and hotel bar receive praise, parking is available but often paid/limited and some rooms lacked a refrigerator; AC control and noisy ventilation noted as negatives for amenities.

Standard amenities available; some items could be enhanced.

Limited amenities mentioned, like absence of tea/coffee.

Mixed perceptions: many find the hotel a good base for location and comfort, but several guests expected better breakfast selection and were unhappy with added costs (daily parking fee).

Several guests mention paid parking, perceived high prices in high season and occasional poor price-quality ratio; value is seen as slightly below expectations.

Good value for the quality of stay and service provided.

Good value for the location and facilities provided.