Premier Inn London Wimbledon - Broadway vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as clean, well-equipped with good beds and showers; some issues reported (occasional noise on street side, broken TV, limited storage, and intermittent air-con problems).

Some guests found rooms comfortable while others reported issues like temperature control and worn conditions.

Beds often described as very comfortable and rooms quiet (good soundproofing). Some guests reported saggy mattresses on certain rooms, limited storage space and missing small amenities (no fridge in some rooms).

Rooms were described as comfortable and spacious.

Mixed reports: several guests noted clean rooms and bathrooms, but at least one review complained about poor cleanliness in the breakfast area and floors under tables.

Several reviews mentioned rooms as clean, but one indicated some neglected maintenance issues.

Generally reported as clean with good room housekeeping and an excellent shower; a few guests noted isolated issues (bathroom not spotless, limescale on showerhead).

The rooms were clean and well-maintained based on multiple reviews.

Consistently praised: quiet, central location near station/old town and within a short walk to major sights.

Multiple reviews highlighted the good location, with easy access to transport.

Consistently praised: central, within walking distance of the centre, close to train/bus stations and easy to access by car.

Great location with supermarkets and metro access nearby.

Generally friendly and helpful staff mentioned by multiple guests, though some reports referenced slow breakfast clearing and unfriendly/non-smiling personnel on occasion.

Overall, staff were described as friendly and helpful in many reviews, although one mention of unfriendly reception impacted the score.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly and helpful at reception; some operational strain due to staff shortages affected breakfast service planning but front-desk interactions were positive.

The staff are incredibly friendly and accommodating.

Breakfast received mixed feedback: many found it good, others criticized small breakfast room, limited options (eggs, orange juice issues) and vending/automatic coffee quality.

Breakfast received positive comments from multiple guests who appreciated the variety.

Breakfast repeatedly called tasty and good quality, but critics noted limited fresh fruit/vegetables, occasional shortages (items running out) and insufficient seating making service feel poorly organised at busy times.

Breakfast quality was criticized, especially hot beverages.

Parking and basic in-room amenities (coffee/tea, pillow choices) appreciated; some negative notes about noisy or non-functioning air conditioning and limited storage space.

Some amenities were praised, but there were complaints about basic features not functioning properly.

Good basic amenities (shower, toiletries sometimes provided) and parking available, but guests reported limited EV chargers, occasional AC shutdown at night, missing bathroom tissues/conditioner and constrained breakfast seating.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Several guests described the hotel as a good value for money for its location and cleanliness, though a few considered breakfast overpriced.

While some guests felt the hotel was worth the money, others believed the prices were too high for the quality.

Perceived as fair by many, but value was dragged down by additional costs (daily parking fee) and expectations not met around breakfast variety and seating for the price.

Considered excellent value particularly for London.