18 Coins Budget Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Rooms praised for comfortable beds, good showers, working AC, fridge and TV; one guest reported an issue with bunk allocation and a difficult ladder.

Some guests reported small rooms and room quality discrepancies compared to photos.

Rooms are often spacious but many guests reported very hard beds, noisy fans, poor bathrooms (shower wetting the room), outdated fittings and mismatched photos; condition is mediocre.

Mixed: rooms noted as spacious with good AC, but several comments about dated rooms, lumpy pillows, limited sockets, occasional lack of hot water and no kettle.

Multiple guests praise cleanliness and daily cleaning; some note that room service may require a door sign to receive cleaning.

Several reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, particularly in room conditions.

Multiple reports of dirt, cockroaches, dirty balconies and inconsistent room cleaning (some guests reported not cleaned once); some guests did note the hotel was clean — overall cleanliness is below expectations.

Mixed signals: many reviews note daily room cleaning and fresh towels, but several guests reported serious issues (stains, lingering odour, sewage smells) that drove the score down.

Frequently described as central and right on Soi Buakhao — very convenient and often surprisingly quiet despite the central spot.

Location was highlighted positively, being central and convenient for many guests.

Location repeatedly described as excellent, central and near activities; this is one of the most consistently praised aspects across reviews.

Very strong: location is repeatedly cited as a primary positive (close to entertainment, nightlife, bars and restaurants).

Mixed reports: many reviewers call staff helpful and English-speaking, but several cite rude, disrespectful receptionists and noisy staff that negatively affected stays.

Service was generally praised across multiple reviews, particularly for staff friendliness.

Many reviews praise friendly and helpful staff, quick check-in and attentive service; a few reports of surly receptionists and language barriers are noted but the prevailing sentiment is very positive.

Consistently praised: reception and staff repeatedly described as helpful, friendly and accommodating in multiple reviews.

Standard quality for this hotel tier

Not explicitly mentioned much, assumed standard quality for this hotel tier.

Sparse mentions overall but the onsite restaurant was specifically praised as very good with great staff; limited other comments on F&B.

Not widely discussed: few direct mentions of F&B; assigned the target rating due to lack of consistent commentary.

Wi‑Fi, fridge, kettle and complimentary water noted and generally work well; occasional power outages in rain and a lack of bedside outlet were reported.

Amenities such as air conditioning and basic room facilities were considered acceptable.

Several mentions of pools closed for renovation, broken/jacuzzi in poor condition, lack of safes and limited in-room amenities — facilities are inconsistent and under renovation at times.

Tarnished by recurring pool closure: pools are a key amenity but many reviews report the main pool closed for renovation; Wi‑Fi and other facilities receive mixed mentions.

Many guests describe the hotel as very good value or cheap for the location and services provided.

Generally regarded as good value, with some guests noting you get what you pay for.

Multiple guests called the hotel cheap and good value for the price despite shortcomings; several reviewers felt the price-to-location/service balance was strong.

Frequently highlighted as very good value: multiple guests explicitly state the hotel offers excellent value for its location and price.