DoubleTree By Hilton Gaziantep vs Similar Hotels

Positive mention of the room being beautiful but dark.

Everything looked very worn.

General satisfaction with room size, though some issues noted.

Rooms often described as spacious, comfortable beds and well-equipped (suites praised); a few guests reported smaller rooms, small windows or isolated defects (e.g., broken WC).

Review mentions 'Kirli' indicating cleanliness issues.

Room was smelly, despite being non-smoking.

Some reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, like an odor in the room.

Frequently praised as 'very clean' across multiple reviews; a few mentions of cigarette smell/ashtray in one room and isolated maintenance issues but overall high hygiene standards.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Reviews highlighted a great central location.

Many guests note a great/convenient location and recommend the hotel; some mention it is further from the city centre without a car (about 14 min) requiring a taxi.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Personnel exceptionally friendly and helpful.

Many positive mentions of friendly and helpful staff.

Consistently highlighted as extremely friendly and helpful (multiple mentions of attentive staff, specific praise for reception staff like Halil); staff responded quickly to requests.

Breakfast could improve with more international options.

Great breakfast with a lot of choices.

Breakfast variety and quality received strong positive feedback.

Breakfast described as varied and tasty by several guests, though a few said breakfast/restaurant could improve and one mentioned the restaurant is ageing compared to the lobby.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Spa services and breakfast were highly praised.

Spa and gym receive positive notes and valet/parking is appreciated; pool reported as cold by one guest and restaurant amenities feel dated to others.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Expectations for value were mixed but generally acceptable.

Mixed sentiment: one explicit complaint that price-performance is not good, others imply solid 4-star value but not 5-star — overall somewhat below top-tier value.