City Plus Rhodes Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Some guests found rooms to be small and uncomfortable.

Room quality received some positive feedback, but also complaints about being outdated.

Rooms described as clean and cosy by some, but others reported uncomfortable beds, basement apartment with damp smell, limited storage and few power outlets — mixed to below-excellent room comfort.

Mixed room quality: functional and comfortable bed/AC/fridge/balcony reported, but multiple complaints about small bathrooms/ narrow showers, drab curtains and an accordion bathroom door affecting privacy.

Multiple reviews highlight issues with older facilities and maintenance.

Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, including cockroaches in rooms.

Many guests reported clean rooms and well-maintained spaces, but several reviews note issues (strong humidity/odour in a basement apartment, limited sockets, fridge problems, towels not always changed) that lower the score.

Mostly described as very clean in multiple reviews, but one guest reported an unclean shower/sink and rusty towel hooks, so cleanliness is slightly below top marks.

The location is praised for being near the ferry and city center.

The location is frequently praised for its proximity to attractions.

Excellent location repeatedly mentioned — 5–10 minute walk to the Old Town, immediate access to a large supermarket and cafes; highly convenient for sightseeing.

Highly convenient location: near the harbour/port, sea views, quiet area outside old town and easy taxi access from the airport; overall a strong location score.

Reviews commend the helpful staff and exceptional service.

Most reviews highlight friendly and helpful staff.

Consistently praised: family-run, very friendly and attentive hosts, warm welcomes, helpful (early check-in mentioned); service is a clear strength.

Consistently praised: staff described as extraordinarily nice, very helpful and attentive (24/7 reception noted), justifying a strong positive score.

Limited mention, but tea and coffee options could be improved.

Breakfast was praised, with good variety and quality.

Limited F&B offering but the host provides breakfast at a good price and this was appreciated by guests; not a major hotel dining operation but positively received.

Mixed F&B: some guests praised the breakfast ("had everything") and the hotel café, while one guest reported a cold breakfast; overall slightly above average but not flawless.

Facilities were acceptable but some were outdated.

The rooftop terrace and breakfast options received positive mentions.

Positive notes for working air conditioning, a small social terrace and owner-offered breakfast; negatives include no elevator, occasional broken fridge, limited in-room facilities and missing toiletries.

Good amenities noted: pool (usable even before/after check-in), hotel café, parking opposite the hotel, fridge, AC, hairdryer and available rental cars; amenities are a clear positive.

Many guests feel they received good value for their stay.

Overall good value for the stay based on guest feedback.

Multiple guests highlighted lower prices than the old town and affordable breakfast options; generally seen as good value despite some room/amenity issues.

Mostly positive value impressions (several guests called price-performance perfect), though one review explicitly said 'not value for money', resulting in a slightly above-target score.