Land Royal Residence Pattaya vs Similar Hotels

Rooms often described as large, with balconies and comfortable beds, but some issues noted (dated furniture, old flush, occasional water/TV problems).

Mixed sentiment: honeymoon and well-scented, air-conditioned rooms praised, but some guests report hard beds and occasional outdated rooms.

Rooms are somewhat outdated but still very comfortable.

General satisfaction with room comfort but some complaints.

Many guests praised clean rooms and bathrooms, but several reports noted poor cleanliness ('not clean at all') and distrust about honesty regarding cleaning.

Multiple reviews explicitly praise cleanliness (clean rooms, fragrant bathrooms); a few mentions of outdated rooms but overall cleanliness is highlighted.

The cleanliness was noted as bad and not maintained in the rooms and public areas.

Negative sentiment expressed about bad smell and cleanliness issues.

Mostly praised as central and convenient/within walking distance, though a few guests reported the booking pin was wrong or that the hotel felt far from the centre.

Several reviews note a good, convenient location and proximity to attractions, while a minority mention being far from main tourist spots or better-located alternatives.

Location is good, offering easy walkable access to nearby places.

Location described as prime and convenient.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and courteous; reception assisted with late check-in and guests specifically praised personnel.

Consistently positive comments about staff: friendly, helpful bellboys, attentive security and good reception service.

Standard service quality for a hotel of this rating.

Consistent positive feedback regarding staff kindness and service quality.

A notable complaint: breakfast was cancelled for at least one booking (compensated with money) despite reservation showing breakfast included; otherwise little mention of F&B quality.

Generally positive comments about tasty food and drinks; one review notes breakfast is plain.

Food quality was deemed unacceptable.

Issues with breakfast variety and specific food preferences.

Pool was praised by some, but guests reported limited parking, weak air-conditioning, dated bathrooms, and problems with WiFi/showers for some.

Positive mentions of pool and pleasant lobby/drinks, but negatives include no microwave in rooms and lack of sauna/gym for some guests.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Amenities appreciated but mentioned need for better food options.

Multiple comments highlighted very good price, great value and cheap rates while still appearing pleasant; strong perception of good value.

Mixed: several guests say the price is fair for what is offered, while others find it a bit expensive compared to nearby options.

With discounts, the price-quality ratio is good.

Mixed feedback on value; some felt it was not sufficient.