Aspalace Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Mixed: rooms are described as clean with good views, but several guests reported thin walls and noise (including early mosque call), and one guest noted bedding issues; room comfort is decent but soundproofing is weak.

Some rooms require refurbishment as indicated by a review.

Some reviews mention that rooms are small and feel cramped, but some guests appreciated room comfort and cleanliness.

Generally reported as clean in multiple reviews, though isolated issues noted (stained sheets, an unclean towel in one report). Overall cleanliness is good but not flawless.

Generally positive remarks about cleanliness, but minor issues indicated.

Several reviews mention issues like cigarette smoke in hallways and poor maintenance.

Consistently praised for central location: close to metro, tram, Sultanahmet and Grand Bazaar; excellent public transport connections and convenient surroundings.

Location is highlighted as excellent, close to many attractions.

Many reviews highlight the excellent location, especially for visiting key attractions.

Repeatedly praised: staff described as very friendly, reliable and exceptionally helpful (named staff Faruk and Shaihinez highlighted). Night staff and reception service made strong positive impressions.

Staff were frequently praised for helpfulness and politeness.

Most reviews praise staff as friendly and eager to help, with notable mentions of individual staff members.

Mixed to negative comments about breakfast (many guests found it lacking or average); restaurant food and rooftop drinks receive positive mentions, but breakfast quality lowered the score.

Breakfast options were described as standard and dull by some.

Breakfast offerings received positive feedback, noted as a highlight for many guests.

Amenities are a strong point: large/enjoyable pool, rooftop terrace/restaurant with views, and generally good on-site facilities noted by several guests.

Spa and other amenities were generally positively received, although some usability issues noted.

Reviewers noted limited amenities, with some complaints about poor pool hours and missing features like working TVs.

Perceived as good value overall—guests mention reasonable price and willingness to return; no widespread complaints about pricing.

Issues with additional charges noted, affecting perceived value.

Guests expressed concerns about overall experience not matching their expectations for the price.