Nidya Hotel Esenyurt vs Similar Hotels

Concerns about old furniture and comfort of beds.

Spacious, clean, and cozy rooms as per guest feedback.

Mixed feedback: some guests received upgraded, beautiful rooms, but several comments cite rooms being small and issues with extra-bed placement and size constraints.

Rooms were not soundproof and had issues with furnishings.

Mentioned cleanliness issues like old rooms and damp in showers.

Mixed sentiments noted with complaints about unpleasant odors.

Multiple guests mention the hotel is new, very clean and rooms comfortable; one review notes room-cleaning was only done once at night which lowered perceptions for a minority of stays.

Mentioned cleanliness was generally praised but furniture had damage.

Proximity to mall and restaurants highlighted positively.

Not specifically mentioned; assumed standard for this hotel tier.

Location described as decentral/industrial but convenient for transit (between airport and city center), close to a mall and ideal for the TUYAP fair — good for short stays and business.

Guests appreciated the prime location close to attractions.

Positive mentions of staff friendliness and support.

Positive experiences with polite and responsive staff.

Staff repeatedly praised (Ms. Buse, Ali Caylar, Aysenur/Ayenor, Jalel); described as friendly, professional, helpful and attentive across reception, restaurant and concierge.

Staff were welcoming and generally met expectations.

Breakfast options generally rated positively.

No specific mentions; assumed average quality.

Breakfast described as good and varied (Turkish and international buffet); hotel restaurant and staff (notably Ali Caylar) receive positive mentions for service and food quality.

Breakfast selection was limited and did not cater well to vegetarians.

Facilities are decent but need improvement; pool and jacuzzi issues.

No specific mentions; rated slightly lower due to overall experience.

Amenities praised (modern gym, spa, pool, concierge floor, helpful concierge services and taxi arrangements); overall regarded as high quality and fitting the Sheraton brand.

Absence of expected amenities like water and towels in the gym.

High price point noted; value perceived as average.

Received mixed sentiments; value not explicitly praised.

Guests comment the hotel offers good value ('waar voor je geld') and reasonable accommodation for the services provided, supporting a slightly above-target score.

Perceived as reasonable in light of location, though some aspects were lacking.