Savoy Grand Hotel Apartments vs Similar Hotels

Reviews mention old furniture and rooms not being very clean.

Rooms are spacious and comfortable, but there were complaints about specific issues.

Multiple functional issues reported: shower not working, AC issues, telephone not working and general low quality comments.

Rooms are uneven in quality: some guests reported large, clean rooms, but others reported noise, cigarette odors, missing amenities (kettle), bedding issues and occasional maintenance problems.

Multiple reviews indicate that cleanliness was a significant issue, with mentions of dirty rooms and areas.

Mentioned concerns about cleanliness in multiple reviews.

Multiple reviews report smelly bedsheets, bed bugs in blankets and missing towels — clearly poor cleanliness.

Multiple reviews mention cigarette smoke smell in rooms, corridors and elevator, reports of dirtiness (hair in bed), and low room hygiene; overall below average cleanliness.

Proximity to various attractions is noted positively, though some reviews mention being in a less desirable area.

Convenient location near the airport, though some reports mention industrial surroundings.

Location is repeatedly listed as a pro in several reviews — a clear strength.

Consistently noted as a strong point: convenient for work and close to transport/airport, guests repeatedly cite good location and accessibility.

Several reviews highlight the helpfulness of the staff, although some remarks indicate inconsistency.

The staff is very helpful and friendly, consistently praised across reviews.

Reception staff is repeatedly mentioned positively, though there are isolated negative incidents (booking change/extra charge, refusal of late checkout, unprofessional night staff). Overall staff interaction is generally praised.

Mixed service: several guests praised helpful staff at times, but there are repeated reports of slow or absent reception (long wait to check in), non-working room phone and reception responsiveness issues.

Positive mention of food quality, though not extensively covered.

Standard quality for this hotel tier, as food and beverage aren't specifically mentioned.

Standard quality for this hotel tier

On-site restaurant available and appreciated by some, but the bar/club is a source of disturbance and some guests note that bookings may not include access to all F&B facilities.

Basic amenities mentioned, though some guests found them lacking.

General satisfaction with offered amenities, though specific references are limited.

Internet instability, AC/remote problems and missing towels indicate weak amenities.

Amenities are limited or inconsistent: presence of bar/club creates noise problems and makes hotel unsuitable for families, some facilities require extra fees, and parking is lacking.

Given the reports of varying quality, the value for money is perceived as average.

Good value noted in conjunction with room quality and service.

Guests describe the hotel as high-priced with low-quality service and say 'not worth it' — poor value.

Many guests explicitly called the hotel affordable and good value (e.g., low nightly price and 'value for money'), making this a clear positive.