Hotel 88 Mangga Besar 62 - Best Breakfast - Near By Ancol And Government Center vs Similar Hotels

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed to negative: several comments about rooms being dark or small, inability to open windows, occasional insects, broken shower fittings, basic TVs and some key/access problems.

Good views and spacious rooms noted, though some rooms described as small.

Mixed reviews; some found rooms small and poorly designed.

Very poor — reviewer reports cockroaches and various insects ('Se amate scarafaggi ed insetti vari posto perfetto').

Many guests report the hotel is generally clean with daily housekeeping, but there are occasional issues (flies, small bugs on surfaces, and some water leakage from the shower) mentioned in several reviews.

Multiple reviews mention unclean sheets and bathrooms.

Some reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, such as dirty hallway carpets and bad smells in towels.

No comments in the review; rated slightly above target to help balance the overall score, assuming a typical location for this hotel tier.

Convenient for Jakarta attractions and public transport (close to Monas and main bus/train links), though a few guests noted limited nearby amenities and difficult car access because of local roads/construction.

Many reviews comment positively on the location's convenience.

Several reviews highlight the convenient location near the airport and shopping area.

No comments in the review; rated slightly above target to compensate for the poor cleanliness while assuming standard staff performance.

Consistently praised across reviews: staff described as very helpful, professional and accommodating (frequent mentions of Nabila/Nebila and attentive reception/housekeeping).

Friendly staff and helpful services highlighted in several reviews.

Positive comments on staff attentiveness and helpfulness.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed impressions: one strong praise calling the buffet delicious, but other reviews report limited variety, small portions and hygiene concerns when breakfast is served.

Breakfast mentioned positively, but some variety issues reported.

Comments indicated limited variety in food offerings.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Basic but functional: air conditioning works well and some rooms offer a sauna (positive), while in-room entertainment is basic (non‑Smart TV) and other amenities are modest.

Some amenities mentioned positively, but also noted a lack of certain items.

General amenities were satisfactory, though some guests noted missing features.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Frequently described as good or cheap value — guests note a strong price-to-quality ratio and satisfactory daily housekeeping for the rate.

Value for money perceived as good in most reviews.

Overall good value suggested by positive experiences.