Savoy Inn Hotel Apartments vs Similar Hotels

Multiple functional issues reported: shower not working, AC issues, telephone not working and general low quality comments.

Reviews mention old furniture and rooms not being very clean.

Rooms are spacious and comfortable, but there were complaints about specific issues.

Mixed: some guests found rooms spacious, comfortable bed and received upgrades; others reported small rooms, no windows, and poor bathroom fittings/shower size.

Multiple reviews report smelly bedsheets, bed bugs in blankets and missing towels — clearly poor cleanliness.

Multiple reviews indicate that cleanliness was a significant issue, with mentions of dirty rooms and areas.

Mentioned concerns about cleanliness in multiple reviews.

Mixed comments: several guests praised clean rooms and toilets, but others reported dirty carpet, unhygienic areas and missing washroom accessories.

Location is repeatedly listed as a pro in several reviews — a clear strength.

Proximity to various attractions is noted positively, though some reviews mention being in a less desirable area.

Convenient location near the airport, though some reports mention industrial surroundings.

Mostly positive: convenient access to restaurants and airport noted, but some guests complained about noise from nearby disco/entertainment affecting rest.

Reception staff is repeatedly mentioned positively, though there are isolated negative incidents (booking change/extra charge, refusal of late checkout, unprofessional night staff). Overall staff interaction is generally praised.

Several reviews highlight the helpfulness of the staff, although some remarks indicate inconsistency.

The staff is very helpful and friendly, consistently praised across reviews.

Generally positive: multiple reports of supportive, attentive staff and good reception; some isolated complaints about booking handling and unresolved refund issues.

Standard quality for this hotel tier

Positive mention of food quality, though not extensively covered.

Standard quality for this hotel tier, as food and beverage aren't specifically mentioned.

Positive remark for breakfast; minor complaints only about low-quality bottled water.

Internet instability, AC/remote problems and missing towels indicate weak amenities.

Basic amenities mentioned, though some guests found them lacking.

General satisfaction with offered amenities, though specific references are limited.

Several amenity issues noted: missing washroom wipers, small shower partitions, no hot water at basin, low-quality bottled water and shared bar/entrance concerns.

Guests describe the hotel as high-priced with low-quality service and say 'not worth it' — poor value.

Given the reports of varying quality, the value for money is perceived as average.

Good value noted in conjunction with room quality and service.

Negative mentions about being charged more than booked and perceptions that price is high compared to alternatives.