LSA Bairro Alto by Numa vs Similar Hotels

Spacious rooms that needed some improvements due to prior usage.

Some rooms were reported as small and poorly maintained, yet comfort was generally acceptable.

Several negative remarks: old or broken furniture (broken cupboard door), dated kitchen, poor lighting, noisy parquet and hard mattresses; a few guests did note modern/up-to-date apartments.

Rooms are well-designed and comfortable, though some had minor complaints regarding size.

There were persistent smells of mold and some issues with insects.

Multiple reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, including dirty bathrooms and poor maintenance.

Mixed feedback: many guests reported the apartments as clean, but several noted worn/dirty coverings, old kitchen fixtures and specific cleanliness issues (e.g., room 105) that lowered impressions.

Immaculate and well-maintained hotel environment, as highlighted in multiple reviews.

The property was well-located, close to key areas in Lisbon.

Consistently praised for its great location near metro and central attractions.

Consistently praised as an excellent/very good location by many guests; a minority noted it can be a long walk (~1 hour) to the city centre.

Centrally located with easy access to major attractions, highly rated by guests.

Communication was great, and daily housekeeping was highlighted positively.

Positive remarks about cordial staff ready to assist.

Generally positive: staff described as pleasant and responsive (quick email replies) with daily cleaning service; some friction due to a slow/buggy online check-in process and ID upload requirements.

Exceptional service from staff, consistently praised across reviews.

No specific mentions, assumed standard quality for this hotel tier.

Not explicitly mentioned, but the presence of tea and snacks adds value.

Positive: breakfast described several times as very good / delicious and a buffet option was appreciated.

Breakfast received good reviews, but suggestions for improvement were noted.

Well-equipped kitchen but lacked some essential cooking items like a microwave.

The availability of refreshments like cookies and tea was noted positively.

Well equipped: guests mention washer, dishwasher, microwave and sufficient cooking utensils; parking available (paid) and luggage lockers exist but may incur extra fees.

Amenities including breakfast and decor were often noted positively.

The stay was considered acceptable for the price.

Mixed reviews on value, with some feeling apartments did not meet their expectations based on the pricing.

Mixed perception: good value for location and cleanliness for some visitors, but extra charges (parking, lockers), dated furnishings and occasional quality issues reduce perceived value for others.

Guests felt they received excellent value for the level of service and facilities provided.