Al Muhaidb Residence Al Takhasossi 2 - Economic vs Similar Hotels

Mixed comments: rooms described as narrow, some old furniture, broken door, faulty gas stove and bathroom issues (poor water drainage/pressure, shower problems) which lower the score.

Room quality was noted as outdated with several complaints regarding maintenance and noise.

Room was comfortable (positive mention in review).

Rooms have spaciousness but some issues with furniture quality and bathroom fixtures were mentioned.

Multiple reviews explicitly complain about lack of cleanliness, unpleasant smells in entrances/gym, and reports of dirty rooms and inadequate maintenance.

The cleanliness received mixed feedback, with some mentioning issues related to room service and flood from the bathroom.

Room was clean and comfortable (positive mention in review).

There were mentions of cleanliness issues in bathrooms and overall maintenance, affecting the perceived quality.

Several guests note the convenient location (close to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and other work/visit sites); location is commonly cited as a key positive.

The hotel location was regarded as advantageous, being near important sites such as a hospital.

Location is excellent (positive mention in review).

The location received positive feedback from various reviews, being central and convenient.

Many guests praise the staff as welcoming, helpful and respectful (specific praise for reception staff including ‘Islam’), though a few reports mention rude reception behaviour; overall service sentiment is strongly positive.

The staff was frequently praised for their kindness and helpfulness, enhancing the overall sentiment towards service.

Staff were friendly and helpful (positive mention in review).

Staff were generally described as friendly, with notable good service from reception, though some training was suggested.

Food/breakfast criticized in a number of reviews (cold, poor quality, hygiene concerns), leading to a below-average rating.

Food options were limited and did not meet expectations, with several complaints about breakfast availability.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Significant complaints regarding breakfast quality and service, suggesting major improvements needed.

Amenities receive mixed feedback: pool referenced but with complaints about water quality, gym reported as needing attention/weights, and noisy elevators/ongoing maintenance disruptions.

Amenities were mentioned but with limitations, particularly regarding breakfast and facilities like laundry.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Some amenities were lacking, especially in food options and bathroom facilities.

Several guests mention fair price and good value for a budget option; some trade-offs in quality are noted but overall value is seen positively.

Although perceived as affordable, several complaints on room conditions balanced the value for money sentiment.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed feedback on pricing versus what is offered; some felt it was not worth the price paid.