Primus Residence Shanghai Hongqiao vs Similar Hotels

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Rooms were generally spacious and well-equipped, though some issues with dampness were reported.

Rooms are spacious with comfortable beds and multiple bathrooms for some rooms, but several reviews mention outdated decor, peeling wallpaper, stains and occasional comfort issues when AC failed.

Rooms are described as clean and modern with good amenities.

The hotel is clean and nice.

The hotel was noted for its cleanliness with specific mentions of clean rooms and a well-maintained environment.

Mixed reports: several guests noted smoke smell in corridors and rooms and some dust/stains on furniture, though other reviews mentioned good housekeeping.

Many reviews indicate clean and well-maintained rooms.

Walking distance to the exhibition center.

The location was good, especially for accessibility to the fair, making it convenient for guests.

Generally very convenient for transit — close to train station and airport — though a few guests noted it is far from some central attractions.

Mentioned as convenient for exhibitions but some reviews indicate it is not ideal.

Staff can speak a little English, which is acceptable.

Staff is noted to be superb and very helpful, which greatly enhances the guest experience.

Consistently praised: staff were described as helpful and efficient (quick room changes, responsive at night, manager singled out for assistance).

Staff is consistently described as friendly, nice, and accommodating.

No food facility available.

Breakfast had a good variety but reviews noted it became monotonous after several days.

Breakfast opinions vary from exceptional to poor — issues include dishes not labeled, food not hot and limited restaurant hours affecting dinner options.

Breakfast was good, but café prices were seen as expensive.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard amenities were provided, but with some limitations on dining options.

Mixed to negative: centralized air-conditioning caused comfort problems (AC off or not working), limited restaurant hours, occasional noise from facilities; minibar/coffee shop available but limited.

Breakfast options were viewed positively, yet some amenities were considered pricey.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Guests found the hotel to offer good value, especially considering the cost in relation to quality.

Mixed perceptions: some guests satisfied with space and service, while others felt facilities were inferior to similarly priced hotels and would not recommend.

Described as great value for money.