Assava Dive Resort - SHA Plus vs Similar Hotels

Mixed feelings; some rooms described as outdated and unclean.

Mixed reviews on room quality, with some guests liking the room size and view while others mentioned discomfort and lack of amenities.

Rooms are generally comfortable, but there were issues with noise and lighting.

Rooms were comfortable, although some mentions of wear.

Diverse opinions; some complaints about room cleanliness and insects.

Mixed reviews on cleanliness with some guests praising the cleanliness while others mentioned issues.

The pool was mentioned as filthy and dirty, indicating poor cleanliness overall.

Mixed comments about cleanliness and maintenance.

Fantastic location near the beach and beautiful views.

The hotel's beachfront location and proximity to the village were highlighted as positive aspects by guests.

Good location near the beach and restaurants, positively highlighted in reviews.

Great location mentioned in multiple reviews.

High praise for the friendliness of the staff and quality of service.

Service was appreciated overall, with some guests having issues with room cleaning and check-in process.

Numerous complaints about service and poor treatment by staff were noted.

Staff were consistently described as friendly, helpful, and attentive.

Excellent food service, with many opting to eat in.

Food and beverage options received positive feedback, with some guests suggesting improvement in variety.

Not specifically mentioned, so rated standard for this hotel tier.

No specific comments, assumed standard for this hotel tier.

Good amenities, but some facilities need updates.

Guests had mixed feedback on amenities, with some mentioning the lack of essential items like fridge, kettle, and toiletries.

Pool amenities were disappointing due to poor maintenance.

Good amenities including bikes for hire and pool.

Generally perceived as fair given the location and amenities.

Opinions varied on the value for money, with some guests feeling it was not justified by the services provided.

Not considered a good value for money due to the issues encountered.

Value for price mentioned positively throughout reviews.