Hotel d'Angleterre vs Similar Hotels

Some guests reported the rooms to be dingy or having issues like bad carpet quality.

Room comfort and quality mentioned positively with some issues noted regarding amenities.

Consistently described as small: many reviews mention very small rooms, small bathrooms and small beds (140 cm or too narrow for two), and some noise/light issues (thin walls).

There were mixed reviews about room quality, with some mentioning spacious rooms while others noted noise issues and poor maintenance.

Some reviews mention issues such as a musty smell and old carpet.

General cleanliness was not specifically mentioned, so a standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed reports: several guests mention cleanliness being acceptable or the property being 'clean and welcoming', but a few reviews explicitly report poor cleanliness and uncomfortable/plastic mattress protectors.

Multiple reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, including dirty bathrooms and old towels.

Many reviews note the hotel's convenient location near the city center.

Comments about the location being close to city walls but some mention of the street not being attractive.

Very strong: repeatedly noted as close to the historic centre/walls and the station, walkable (around 10–25 minutes), with convenient surroundings and good access for sightseeing.

Many reviews praised the central location of the hotel, making it easy to access attractions.

Reviews frequently highlight the staff's friendliness and attentive service.

Multiple positive comments about friendly and attentive staff.

Mostly positive comments about friendly, helpful staff (morning team and a kindly night receptionist highlighted). One review mentions an extremely rude receptionist, but overall staff friendliness is repeatedly praised.

Most reviews highlighted good service, although there were some mentions of unprofessional behavior.

Mixed reviews of breakfast quality, but some favorable mentions.

Breakfast was generally praised with minor suggestions for improvement.

Breakfast is frequently praised as good/very good and copious for the chain's standard, with an appreciated shaded terrace; a few guests note limited variety typical of the brand.

While some guests enjoyed the breakfast, others suggested improvements in variety and quality.

The presence of parking and some positive mentions of available facilities.

General amenities were not extensively covered but noted some missing items.

Limited: several guests note absence of fridge/kettle/tea tray and no private parking; positives include free street/night parking nearby and secure courtyard for motorcycles/bikes.

Amenities were mentioned but with some complaints about lacking maintenance and quality.

Overall perceived as fair for the pricing given the location.

Comments on good value for money received.

Mixed but generally acceptable: some guests call it reasonable/good value for a short stay or festival use, while a few feel it's overpriced for the small room/quality.

Several guests appreciated the value offered for the price, despite experience discrepancies.