Courtyard by Marriott Shanghai Hongqiao vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are described as clean and modern with good amenities.

Most reviews praised room comfort and amenities, though some indicated issues like humidity.

Rooms are spacious with comfortable beds and multiple bathrooms for some rooms, but several reviews mention outdated decor, peeling wallpaper, stains and occasional comfort issues when AC failed.

Rooms were generally spacious and well-equipped, though some issues with dampness were reported.

Many reviews indicate clean and well-maintained rooms.

One review mentioned an unpleasant smell in the room, indicating cleanliness issues.

Mixed reports: several guests noted smoke smell in corridors and rooms and some dust/stains on furniture, though other reviews mentioned good housekeeping.

The hotel was noted for its cleanliness with specific mentions of clean rooms and a well-maintained environment.

Mentioned as convenient for exhibitions but some reviews indicate it is not ideal.

Several reviews noted the great location, particularly for event access.

Generally very convenient for transit — close to train station and airport — though a few guests noted it is far from some central attractions.

The location was good, especially for accessibility to the fair, making it convenient for guests.

Staff is consistently described as friendly, nice, and accommodating.

General sentiment about helpful staff and positive experiences with service.

Consistently praised: staff were described as helpful and efficient (quick room changes, responsive at night, manager singled out for assistance).

Staff is noted to be superb and very helpful, which greatly enhances the guest experience.

Breakfast was good, but café prices were seen as expensive.

Breakfast choices received high praise and were described as excellent.

Breakfast opinions vary from exceptional to poor — issues include dishes not labeled, food not hot and limited restaurant hours affecting dinner options.

Breakfast had a good variety but reviews noted it became monotonous after several days.

Breakfast options were viewed positively, yet some amenities were considered pricey.

Amenities were well-received, but the empty minibar was noted as a downside.

Mixed to negative: centralized air-conditioning caused comfort problems (AC off or not working), limited restaurant hours, occasional noise from facilities; minibar/coffee shop available but limited.

Standard amenities were provided, but with some limitations on dining options.

Described as great value for money.

Good value for the level of service and amenities provided, especially for business travelers.

Mixed perceptions: some guests satisfied with space and service, while others felt facilities were inferior to similarly priced hotels and would not recommend.

Guests found the hotel to offer good value, especially considering the cost in relation to quality.