New Pola Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are described as dated and sometimes cramped with aging furniture and occasional broken fixtures, but some guests found beds comfortable and rooms acceptable for the price.

Rooms described as old-fashioned and in need of renovation in several reviews.

Most reviews praised the spaciousness and comfort of the rooms, despite a few comments on the quality of furnishings.

Several complaints about noise, dirty rooms, and poor room conditions were noted.

Multiple reviews mention musty, dirty rooms and unsanitary toilets; one report called the overall room appearance dirty despite one guest noting a spotless bathroom in a different stay.

Several reviews mentioned poor cleanliness, especially in the bathrooms.

Several reviews mentioned hygiene issues and cleanliness problems in the bathrooms and kitchens.

Multiple reviews indicated that the rooms and amenities were not clean and poorly maintained.

Consistently praised: right in front of the Nile, close to Luxor Temple/central areas and many restaurants — location is a clear strong point.

Many guests praised the beautiful location by the Nile and proximity to attractions.

Reviews indicated a good location, convenient for sightseeing and amenities.

The location was frequently praised for its proximity to Luxor Temple and local attractions.

Mixed reports: several reviewers praised friendly staff and helpful reception, but others reported an arrogant owner, weak service and language/communication difficulties; overall some staff positives balance negatives.

Staff is overall helpful and nice, although some communication issues were noted.

Multiple reviews highlighted excellent service from the host.

The staff were described as helpful and welcoming, with good service during buffet and check-in.

Multiple reviews explicitly note there is no breakfast offered and food/breakfast service is poor or absent; limited positive mention of F&B.

Breakfast variety and quality received positive feedback.

Not explicitly mentioned in reviews; assumed satisfactory.

Food variety was limited and not well received, but breakfast was available.

Several guests report no Wi‑Fi, no advertised kettle, limited toiletries, missing or broken hairdryer and lack of offered daily water; amenities are generally poor or inconsistent.

The floating pool and beautiful gardens were positively highlighted.

Mixed feedback on amenities; some mentioned lacking items like a hairdryer.

Amenities received mixed reviews; some nice features were mentioned, but overall basic.

Some guests booked for the price and found the location/value acceptable; others felt quality did not match price. Overall perceived as reasonable value by a number of reviewers.

Some mentions of high prices for services and food, affecting overall perception of value.

Generally seen as affordable with good space for groups.

Value for money perceived as reasonable due to location, despite other shortcomings.