W22 by Burasari vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as comfortable with good beds and some spacious rooms, but a few guests noted small room size as a drawback.

Rooms were comfortable, spacious, and clean.

Rooms were clean but noted to be somewhat dated with stale smell issues.

Mixed feedback: rooms generally spacious but several reports of high temperature (west-facing windows), difficult-to-control AC, low bathroom doors and small shower areas; some doors not closing fully.

Generally reported as clean (e.g., 'sehr sauber') in multiple reviews; no major cleanliness complaints about rooms, though some mentions concern neighborhood odors rather than room hygiene.

The hotel was very clean and well-maintained.

Generally clean rooms mentioned; issues with dated smell in rooms noted.

Frequently praised: rooms described as clean, towels changed daily and daily housekeeping reported; occasional remarks about pool clarity but room cleanliness consistently positive.

Very strong consensus on excellent location near Chinatown, MRT and local food spots; repeatedly listed as a primary positive ('Ligging', 'Excellent location', 'Vlakbij Chinatown').

Convenient and central location near metro and night markets.

Amazing location in the heart of Chinatown, with access to street food and attractions.

Consistently highlighted as ideal/central for sightseeing with many landmarks and a metro station within walking distance; multiple guests emphasised excellent location.

Consistently praised staff: 'erg vriendelijk', helpful concierge (Nicky), 'Sehr freundliches und hilfsbereiten Personal' and repeat guests cite friendly, helpful staff and housekeeping availability.

Some mentioned staff were cold and unhelpful, but generally satisfactory.

Staff was friendly and helpful, despite some comments about busyness.

Staff repeatedly described as welcoming, helpful and accommodating (handled AC issue, allowed luggage storage); service is a strong point in multiple reviews.

Breakfast is a mixed point: some like the Thai options and value for price, while several guests called the breakfast underwhelming or limited.

Breakfast options varied but some found them lacking.

Limited breakfast choices and a few complaints about cocktails.

Breakfast frequently praised as varied and local; hotel restaurant described as 'very correct'; only minor suggestions (e.g., hot chocolate) noted.

Shared facilities (pool table, laundry, fitness equipment, coffee machine) appreciated and add value; breakfast offering and on-site amenities are basic but useful.

Limited amenities available in rooms (no tea/coffee).

Pool and rooftop amenities positively highlighted; some complaints about pool chair availability.

Good amenities noted (pool, Wi‑Fi, nearby restaurants, massage options) but recurring comments about the pool being sometimes cloudy/dirty or easily accessible from outside reduce the score.

Multiple reviewers explicitly cite good price/quality and repeat stays because of the price and location ('El precio y la ubicación', '가성비 굿').

Generally good value but some services were underwhelming.

Good value for the location; breakfast prices considered high.

Multiple mentions of very good value for money and return visits; guests felt the price matched the quality and location.