Danis Hotel & Spa Istanbul - Old City vs Similar Hotels

Some reviews mention that rooms are small and feel cramped, but some guests appreciated room comfort and cleanliness.

Some rooms require refurbishment as indicated by a review.

Room quality faced some negative feedback, with comments about small room sizes and differing from pictures.

Mixed: rooms are described as clean with good views, but several guests reported thin walls and noise (including early mosque call), and one guest noted bedding issues; room comfort is decent but soundproofing is weak.

Several reviews mention issues like cigarette smoke in hallways and poor maintenance.

Generally positive remarks about cleanliness, but minor issues indicated.

There were mentions of cleanliness problems, such as the Wi-Fi issues and other negative remarks.

Generally reported as clean in multiple reviews, though isolated issues noted (stained sheets, an unclean towel in one report). Overall cleanliness is good but not flawless.

Many reviews highlight the excellent location, especially for visiting key attractions.

Location is highlighted as excellent, close to many attractions.

The location received consistent positive mentions, highlighting convenience and proximity to metro stations.

Consistently praised for central location: close to metro, tram, Sultanahmet and Grand Bazaar; excellent public transport connections and convenient surroundings.

Most reviews praise staff as friendly and eager to help, with notable mentions of individual staff members.

Staff were frequently praised for helpfulness and politeness.

Several reviews praised the friendliness of the staff, although there were some criticisms regarding reception.

Repeatedly praised: staff described as very friendly, reliable and exceptionally helpful (named staff Faruk and Shaihinez highlighted). Night staff and reception service made strong positive impressions.

Breakfast offerings received positive feedback, noted as a highlight for many guests.

Breakfast options were described as standard and dull by some.

Food quality was praised, but there were issues with the breakfast selection and ordering process.

Mixed to negative comments about breakfast (many guests found it lacking or average); restaurant food and rooftop drinks receive positive mentions, but breakfast quality lowered the score.

Reviewers noted limited amenities, with some complaints about poor pool hours and missing features like working TVs.

Spa and other amenities were generally positively received, although some usability issues noted.

The hotel offers good amenities, including a restaurant and spa, but there were some issues with the chaotic breakfast.

Amenities are a strong point: large/enjoyable pool, rooftop terrace/restaurant with views, and generally good on-site facilities noted by several guests.

Guests expressed concerns about overall experience not matching their expectations for the price.

Issues with additional charges noted, affecting perceived value.

Value for the price is considered good despite some drawbacks mentioned.

Perceived as good value overall—guests mention reasonable price and willingness to return; no widespread complaints about pricing.