Edinburgh House Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Mixed: some guests found rooms cosy and comfortable, others described tiny, dated or unrenovated rooms (1980s), warm attic rooms and basement rooms—average-to-slightly-below-average room quality.

Room size and comfort received mixed reviews, some expressed dissatisfaction.

Issues with room assignments and inconsistent maintenance.

Rooms generally well-equipped, though some feel compact.

Mixed comments: several guests said rooms and bathrooms were clean and functional, but multiple reviews noted poor drainage, a leaking vent, and at least one report of unsatisfactory cleanliness and dated fittings, so cleanliness is below average.

Some reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, particularly regarding carpets.

Mixed feedback; some reports of unclean bedding.

General feedback indicates apartments are clean and well presented.

Consistently praised: close to bus links, good access to Edinburgh city centre, pleasant park nearby and quiet neighbourhood—location is a clear positive.

The location was praised across multiple reviews for its convenience.

Consistently praised for being good and well-connected.

Exceptional location with easy access to major attractions and transport.

Generally positive: staff described as friendly and helpful with useful local tips; one case of slow resolution (TV fixed partially after 3 days) lowers the score slightly but overall service is a strength.

Reviews frequently highlight friendly and helpful staff.

Service was standard; issues raised were addressed, but satisfaction varied.

Staff were contactable and responsive, ensuring a pleasant stay.

Hardly mentioned directly; one guest recommended a nearby café for breakfast. No major positives or negatives about hotel F&B, so assigned the target/neutral score.

Breakfast received mixed reviews; some found it average.

Not mentioned; assumed standard for this rating.

Food and beverage options are not mentioned, maintaining standard expectations.

Several amenity problems reported: non-working TV and Wi‑Fi in some rooms, shower issues, no AC in attic rooms, limited parking. Although basic amenities exist (microwave access), reliability is an issue.

Amenities were generally considered good, though some reported average food quality.

Some amenities lacking, but mentioned others were satisfactory.

Amenities are sufficient for short stays but lack certain essentials in some apartments.

Mixed perceptions: a few guests felt the price-quality ratio was good, others felt it was not good value given room condition and amenity issues, so value is slightly below neutral.

Many reviews noted that the accommodation offered great value for its price.

Varied opinions; some felt it did not meet expectations.

Good value for the quality and location provided.