St Laurn The Spiritual Resort vs Similar Hotels

Mixed reviews indicate that rooms are old, with mentions of old furniture and cleanliness issues.

Rooms are generally clean and comfortable and suites praised, but mattress quality was repeatedly called out as saggy/awful causing back pain for some guests.

Mixed feedback: some rooms described as clean and adequate, while other guests reported very small rooms, mismatch with booking photos, and issues like lack of hot water.

Negative comments about room conditions, including untidy and outdated features.

Several reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, including unhygienic dining areas and poorly maintained rooms.

Multiple guests praised room cleanliness, towels and sheets; generally kept well. Minor limescale in some bathroom crevices noted by one reviewer.

Generally reported as clean and tidy in several reviews, though a few guests mentioned insects and spotty cleanliness in specific rooms.

Numerous mentions of poor cleanliness and maintenance across reviews.

Location is generally described positively, especially in relation to spiritual activities.

Frequently described as conveniently/perfectly located for temple visits and local access.

Frequently praised as a nice/great location and convenient for guests (several positive mentions).

Location praised for convenience and accessibility.

Positive mentions about the staff being courteous and helpful with good service overall.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, welcoming, cooperative and exceptional (smooth check-in, helpful attendants, royal treatment). Shuttle/drop-pick and temple transport were appreciated. One serious front-desk complaint related to handling of a pet was reported.

Multiple mentions of extremely helpful, polite and attentive staff; a few isolated reports of poor front-desk behaviour but overall service was a strong positive.

Staff received positive remarks for being helpful and polite.

Food quality was mostly considered good, but there were occasional complaints about service and variety.

Repeated comments about limited menu options at lunch and breakfast, unsatisfactory variety and a request for more breakfast dishes and earlier meal timings.

Multiple negative comments about food quality, hygiene and lack of variety; breakfast described as ordinary by several guests.

Mixed sentiments; some find food prices high and quality unsatisfactory.

Some amenities were praised, like the complimentary shuttle service, but there were complaints about room features.

Complimentary transport/shuttle to the temple and basic amenities (bottled water, towels) were valued. Some ancillary services (travel desk/taxi hiring) and a small restaurant space were criticized.

Amenities are mixed: free transfer to the Shirdi Sai temple is a plus, but parking is limited or absent and reliable hot water was reported as an issue by some guests.

Some mention of facilities requiring improvement, particularly regarding maintenance.

High tariff for the quality of rooms and services received led to a perception of poor value.

Many guests felt the stay was good value and would recommend; a few guests felt rates were high or cited booking/payment issues (app-related) that affected perceived value.

Divergent opinions: some guests felt it was good value, but several explicitly complained about poor value for money given room size, food quality and parking issues.

Comments suggest that the prices do not align with the quality provided.