
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Location
10.0Many guests appreciated the excellent location near the beachfront.
Service
9.4Some staff appeared inexperienced and unhelpful, but there were positive interactions reported.
Value
9.9Some guests felt it was good value given the location, despite other issues.




What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
The Clarendon Hotel
8.1/10The Rose
8.9/10Royal Hotel
8.2/10Waterfront Hotel
9/10The Clarendon Hotel
7.4Rooms are described as clean and comfortable with great views, but there are repeated issues: hard or small beds, low/poor shower heads and water pressure, dated fittings, and intermittent noise from AC/fans.
The Rose
8.8Comfortable and well-appointed rooms.
Royal Hotel
7.7Rooms generally comfortable, but some describe a need for refurbishment.
Waterfront Hotel
7.9Rooms were often uncomfortable, cold, and in need of renovation.
The Clarendon Hotel
9.0Multiple reviews state 'very clean', 'clean and tidy' and 'suite was lovely and clean' — overall cleanliness is a clear strength.
The Rose
8.7Standard quality for this hotel tier.
Royal Hotel
7.7Feedback indicates cleanliness is acceptable, but some guests reported issues with room maintenance.
Waterfront Hotel
7.4There were instances of dirty rooms and used items found in the shower.
The Clarendon Hotel
9.5Consistently praised as perfect, right on the beach / seafront with great sea views and convenient access to restaurants — location is a standout feature.
The Rose
9.2Well-located with a central position ideal for exploring.
Royal Hotel
9.2Multiple reviews highlighted the fantastic beachfront location.
Waterfront Hotel
10.0Many guests appreciated the excellent location near the beachfront.
The Clarendon Hotel
8.6Staff repeatedly described as pleasant, friendly and helpful; early check-in was offered. A few notes about limited reception hours (no reception after 5pm) slightly temper the score.
The Rose
9.3Staff were friendly and went above and beyond to ensure a great experience.
Royal Hotel
8.7Staff were generally described as friendly and helpful.
Waterfront Hotel
9.4Some staff appeared inexperienced and unhelpful, but there were positive interactions reported.
The Clarendon Hotel
—The Rose
—Royal Hotel
—Waterfront Hotel
—The Clarendon Hotel
6.3No breakfast offered at the hotel in multiple reports, an expired vending machine and smells from a nearby restaurant were mentioned — limited and inconsistent F&B experience.
The Rose
9.2Food was absolutely delicious with a great breakfast menu.
Royal Hotel
7.7Some meals were described positively, while breakfast faced criticism.
Waterfront Hotel
10.0Breakfast received positive mentions from multiple guests.
The Clarendon Hotel
8.3In-room amenities (fridge, microwave, kettle, coffee machine) are frequently noted positively. Paid parking is available but can be cumbersome; vending machine and lack of breakfast reduce the score slightly.
The Rose
8.4Some amenities were lacking (no TV in room), but the overall experience was good.
Royal Hotel
8.2Amenities were satisfactory, but general maintenance needs attention.
Waterfront Hotel
8.4Limited heating facilities and Wi-Fi issues were mentioned.
The Clarendon Hotel
6.6Several guests commented that the property felt poor value for money (no breakfast included, expectation mismatch); value perception is notably weaker than other areas.
The Rose
8.6Standard quality for this hotel tier.
Royal Hotel
8.2Guests felt the hotel provided good value, especially given its location.
Waterfront Hotel
9.9Some guests felt it was good value given the location, despite other issues.
The Clarendon Hotel
Deal CastleThe Rose
Deal CastleRoyal Hotel
Deal CastleWaterfront Hotel
Deal Castle