PS APARTMENTS vs Similar Hotels

Room issues were noted, including cold temperatures, broken appliances, and lack of amenities.

Some guests noted rooms were clean but mentioned issues like small sizes and outdated decor.

Several reviews noted rooms were small, dated, or had issues.

Multiple reviews mention small room sizes and temperature issues, leading to a lower rating.

There were issues with cleanliness in several rooms, including dirty bedding and a bad smell.

Most reviews mentioned clean rooms, although some areas were described as a little tired.

Room condition varied; some guests mentioned dirtiness and discomfort.

Rooms were reported as clean, but complaints about small size and some amenities suggest room for improvement.

Great location central to the city with easy access to attractions.

Multiple reviews praised the convenient location near the port and city center.

Many guests highlighted great location benefits.

The proximity to restaurants and cruise ports was appreciated, although noise from the busy area was a downside.

Generally good service, but instances of noise disruptions were noted.

Staff were described as friendly and accommodating, contributing positively to the overall experience.

Staff received consistent praise for helpfulness and friendliness.

Friendly staff were highlighted, especially assistance from the barman, contributing to a positive sentiment.

Basic beverage provisions were lacking, but overall not a significant issue.

Breakfast received positive reviews, although some found it monotonous over multiple days.

Breakfast was often described as chaotic with limited options.

Limited food options on-site and confusion regarding breakfast contributed to a lower score.

Limited amenities reported, such as insufficient sockets and missing equipment.

Basic amenities were provided effectively but lacked some expected features (e.g., hair dryer).

Basic amenities reported, with some lacking supply and quality.

Basic amenities were available, but complaints about the bathroom size and window restrictions were noted.

Considered good value for the price paid despite room quality issues.

Guests generally felt they received good value for their money given the facilities offered.

Guests felt it was acceptable for budget stays, though few noted a lack of quality.

The overall value for the price paid was regarded positively, making it a good choice for budget travelers.