Hotel 77 Seventy-Seven - Maison D'Art Collection vs Similar Hotels

Mixed: some guests found the rooms lovely and appropriately sized, while others reported issues (faulty door lock, plumbing/noise, hard pillows, rooms not matching advertised junior suite), so room quality is slightly below average.

Rooms were described as comfortable, although some mentioned size issues.

Some guests found the rooms somewhat dated, with outdated decor and concerns about wear and tear.

Multiple guests mentioned rooms being shabby and in need of updates.

Mixed reports: several guests praised clean rooms and air conditioning, but at least one review explicitly called out dirtiness ('La saleté'), so cleanliness is below average overall.

Some reviews indicate issues with cleanliness in rooms.

Some guests noted issues with cleanliness, particularly regarding the outdated bathroom and signs of wear in room fixtures.

The rooms were not very well cleaned. Especially the bathroom and shower. Some mold. Sticky floor.

Consistently strong: many guests highlighted an ideal location near the Colosseum and Roma Termini and easy walking access to attractions.

Guests consistently mentioned the excellent location near public transport and attractions.

The location is highly praised for its proximity to historical sites and tourist attractions.

Many reviews highlight the excellent location near attractions.

Mixed but generally positive: multiple reviewers praised friendly, helpful staff (assisted with surprises, welcoming), though several accounts describe dismissive or unfriendly reception and poor handling of problems; overall leaning positive due to notable helpful gestures but inconsistent.

Multiple reviews praised the friendly and helpful staff.

Guests generally appreciated the professional and kind staff who provided good service.

Specific sentiment suggests standard service quality for this hotel tier.

Generally acceptable with minor complaints: breakfast described as 'normal' by some and missing small items (no butter); no widespread strong negatives about food service.

Breakfast received mixed reviews with some guests finding it insufficient.

Breakfast options were noted as decent but had room for improvement, particularly in variety.

Good breakfast served in a pleasant environment.

Several negative notes: advertised facilities were missing or unavailable for some guests (pool under renovation/too cold, spa unusable, rooftop bar replaced/closed, restaurant not present), so amenities score is low.

Facilities were noted as clean and well-equipped, though breakfast quality varied.

General amenities were acceptable, though some reviews suggested further improvements could be made.

Rooftop terrace and good breakfast mentioned positively.

Mixed perceptions: some guests said value for money was very good, while others felt the property was overpriced or misrepresented for the price paid.

Overall perceived as good value based on location and comfort.

Many guests felt that the experience was worth the money spent, given the location and service.

Mixed sentiments; some guests feel it does not meet 5-star standards.