Apartment Havenstraat vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were described as spacious, comfortable, and well decorated.

Rooms are described as lovely and comfortable with good furnishings.

Mixed to poor: rooms are spacious and sometimes comfortable, but several guests noted old/damaged furniture, need for renovation, very soft mattress (disturbing sleep) and general wear.

Rooms were spacious and comfortable, with notable upgrades; however, issues with lighting were mentioned.

The apartment was very clean and tidy as mentioned in multiple reviews.

Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, particularly regarding the bathroom.

Mixed reports: some guests praised a clean room ('Sauberes Zimmer'), but several reported mold in air and shower, dirty toilet and spider webs, indicating inconsistent housekeeping/maintenance.

Some reviews indicated discomfort with cleanliness, especially regarding the maintenance of common areas.

Excellent transport links and proximity to city center were highlighted.

The location is praised as brilliant, close to transport and attractions.

Outstanding central location: described as ideal for exploring Delft, quiet yet central, short walking distance to attractions and close to parking/transport.

Many reviews praised the central location and proximity to attractions.

The host was described as warm, welcoming, and incredibly helpful.

The host was considerate, preparing the sofa bed and providing cooling fans.

Very positive: staff repeatedly described as amazing, kind, friendly and helpful; multiple mentions of excellent, welcoming service and willingness to stay again.

Service was mostly positive, though there were instances of unfriendliness reported.

Complimentary food items and breakfast options were praised.

Not specifically mentioned; assumed as standard quality for this hotel tier.

Generally positive: several guests praised the breakfast (fresh juices, good offering), though there was at least one complaint about breakfast not being available on certain dates without prior communication.

Breakfast received mixed reviews; quality and comfort were issues.

Well equipped kitchen with necessary utensils and complimentary items.

The kitchen is well stocked and additional cooling fans were provided.

Underwhelming: air conditioning often insufficient, no elevator/handrail issues, no minibar, lack of blackout curtains and occasional breakfast service disruptions — amenities do not fully meet expectations.

Amenities were satisfactory, but some guests indicated a need for more comfort in furniture.

The overall experience justified the price given the location and amenities.

While some felt the price was high, the overall experience was deemed worthwhile.

Negative: multiple guests felt the room rate was high and not justified by facilities or comfort (poor blackout, pillow/bed issues, lack of minibar), leading to low perceived value.

Guests felt the price was reasonable for the location and quality of the hotel.