Degla view - Cairo vs Similar Hotels

Spacious apartment with three bedrooms and a fully equipped kitchen.

Several complaints about worn or damaged furniture (old/abîmé meubles), sofa beds in bad shape, exposed electrical wires and leaks — room quality is a weak point.

Rooms were described as spacious, well-decorated, and comfortable.

Several specific room issues reported: wrong bed allocation, promised bathtub missing, old building condition, noisy AC, mattresses/pillows needing improvement and balconies too close (privacy concerns).

Clean and well-equipped apartment as per the review.

Mixed reports: many reviewers note clean rooms and apartments, but multiple comments about dirty sofa beds, occasional unclean bedding and stains reduce the score slightly.

There were reported issues with the shower and hot water, affecting overall cleanliness experience.

Multiple guests explicitly praised cleanliness (e.g., “clean”), and the hotel is described as comfortable and well kept.

Located far from transportation options, which is a major concern.

Location is repeatedly described as convenient (close to GoBus/Nasr City) and quiet; generally seen as a positive aspect.

The location near main attractions and in a calm neighborhood was widely praised.

Guests praise the large landscaped setting, variety of restaurants and scenic views; some frustration noted about compound layout, multiple gates and reliance on golf buggies affecting accessibility.

Hosts are very helpful and responsive, addressing all requests promptly.

Consistently praised staff (multiple mentions of Mina by name), described as very helpful, friendly and responsive — service is a clear strength.

Mixed sentiments; though there were issues reported, the staff was noted as generally helpful and professional.

Staff are repeatedly described as friendly, accommodating and attentive (special mention of reception staff). A few comments note some uncooperative staff, but overall service sentiment is very positive.

No specific mention in reviews; assuming standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast is explicitly criticized as mediocre or unsatisfactory in several reviews; in-room breakfast options limited and quality is below expectations.

No specific mentions, assumed standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast buffet and food receive high praise (“great”, “amazing”); room service quality was good but sometimes slow.

Includes washing machine and nearby shopping services.

Missing or inconsistent amenities noted (no shower gel/shampoo, limited towels, no balcony seating); some features work but others are lacking.

Amenities were noted as great and well-suited for families.

Wide range of amenities mentioned (many restaurants, cafes, cinema, pools); generally considered strong, though a few note the pool size is small.

The overall quality justifies the cost, as indicated by the reviews.

Overall perception leans positive—many call it comfortable and 'home away from home' and suitable for short stays, though some issues (furniture, breakfast) affect perceived value.

The overall experience and comfort align with the price range.

Explicitly called out as not value for money in the headline and several comments—guests expected higher standard for the price paid.