EJ Homes - Fame Residences vs Similar Hotels

Room quality is not mentioned, assumed to be standard quality for this hotel tier.

While many rooms are comfortable, some complaints about outdated furnishings and maintenance issues were noted.

Rooms are spacious with large windows (good for claustrophobic guests) but are dated for some guests; reports of cockroaches, mould, soft/worn pillows and missing kitchenware lower the score.

Many guests mentioned nice rooms and premium quality throughout their stay.

The review mentions a concern about the cleanliness due to owners being unreachable, indicating a slight decline in expectation.

There are reports of unclean curtains, wallpaper, and dust under furniture, indicating a need for better maintenance.

Multiple reviews report cockroaches, mould in shower curtains, worn towels and old comforters — cleanliness is inconsistent and lowers the score despite some guests noting generally clean room ambiance.

Generally positive sentiment, although some guests noted minor aspects needing attention.

The location is not directly mentioned, assumed to be standard quality for this hotel tier.

Proximity to shopping and event locations is frequently praised.

Very strong: repeatedly cited as central and directly opposite SM Megamall and convenient for government offices and shopping — a key strength.

Great location next to shopping and other attractions, contributing to the overall experience.

The review implies a level of concern regarding service due to owner unavailability but overall does not express dissatisfaction.

Friendly and accommodating staff were frequently mentioned across multiple reviews.

Staff repeatedly praised: accommodating front desk, helpful bellboys (named Elmark and Rey) and generally 'amazing' service noted by several guests.

Consistently high praise for staff friendliness and helpfulness across multiple reviews.

Food and beverage options are not mentioned, assumed to be standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast received positive comments, but lack of dining options needs improvement.

Standard quality for this hotel tier

Exceptional breakfast and dining options consistently highlighted by guests.

Amenities are not mentioned, assumed to be standard quality for this hotel tier.

The hotel provides basic amenities, but there are limitations such as no food service as per the menu.

Mixed: facilities and pool are positive but pool location, elevator reliability (long waits) and missing kitchen items/AC in corridors were flagged; overall amenities are serviceable but inconsistent.

Well-equipped gym and other facilities, though some reviews lacked specifics.

Value for money is not mentioned, assumed to be standard quality for this hotel tier.

Value for the price is considered good, especially with the inclusive breakfast.

Convenient location and room size add value, but extra charge/refund issues and dated/unclean elements reduce perceived value for some guests.

Guests felt they received good value for the rates charged.