foodiejive appartement 2 vs Similar Hotels

Issues with upstairs room, mattress on the floor, some tight spaces.

Feedback highlights incorrect room descriptions and poor room quality.

Some complaints about room conditions, such as small bathrooms and noise issues.

Rooms reported as spacious, but some complaints about noise and furniture quality.

Very clean, charming and cozy.

Reviews mention dirty apartments and poor conditions.

Mixed sentiments regarding cleanliness; some issues with the shower and general upkeep mentioned.

Several reviews mentioned cleanliness concerns and dirty amenities.

Good location for events but difficult for accessing other activities.

Proximity of the location is noted positively.

Good location near central station and city center, well-reviewed by multiple guests.

Multiple reviews highlighted the convenience of the location.

Friendly staff, standard quality for this hotel tier.

Multiple comments reflect issues with customer service and lack of response.

Adequate service with good communication with the owner, though there were some concerns with responsiveness.

Some guests mentioned good service despite issues with check-in.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Not mentioned in reviews; standard quality for this hotel tier.

Provided coffee and tea, which was positively mentioned.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Basic amenities but clean and well-decorated.

Amenities not mentioned; average score assigned.

Amenities generally met expectations, although the heater issues were noted.

Lack of adequate kitchen supplies and issues with furniture mentioned.

Great value for the price, especially for cleanliness and decoration.

Concerns raised about hidden charges and poor value as claimed in reviews.

Value perceived as average due to some discomforts and issues with the facilities.

Mixed reviews on value, considering the ratings seem inflated from some perspectives.