The Central Park vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were generally spacious but some were noted as old and uncomfortable.

Mixed: several guests reported small rooms, worn/damaged wooden furniture, broken towel bars, malfunctioning AC, faulty TV remotes and general maintenance issues; some reviews still called the room ambience good, so quality is inconsistent.

Rooms were clean and comfortable; some comments about room size.

Rooms are tiny for the price, but some guests appreciated cleanliness.

Several reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, including cockroaches.

Very negative in multiple reviews: rooms described as filthy, pillows smelling used, no bed sheet on mattress, stained carpets and unpleasant smells; obvious housekeeping failures and exposed/broken wiring in rooms.

Generally clean, but some complaints noted about cleanliness.

Rooms were well-maintained, but concerns about room size and key issues.

Location was described as lacking nearby cafes or restaurants.

Consistently positive: multiple reviews explicitly praise the hotel's location and describe it as a strong point.

Location is convenient and well-loved by guests.

Property is centrally located in the heart of the city.

Staff were consistently praised for being friendly and helpful.

Mixed but often criticized: several reports of extremely slow service, poor telephone communication, repeated false assurances from front desk and long delays retrieving items; however staff eventually responded in some instances, so responsiveness is inconsistent rather than wholly absent.

Staff was polite and helpful, receiving multiple positive comments.

Staff provided excellent service, attentive and professional throughout the stay.

Breakfast offerings were varied and generally positive, though some options were lacking.

Generally positive for breakfast: multiple guests praised the breakfast spread and variety; isolated serious complaints about specific items (sausage smell, damp chips, peanuts incident) but overall F&B (particularly breakfast) is a strong point.

Food quality was average with some negative feedback.

Breakfast had a great variety, with personalized service from the chef.

Amenities offered a good variety and met most guest requirements.

Negative notes on specific amenities: pool reportedly non-operational and fitness centre equipment broken; restaurant/service issues noted, but hotel still offers standard amenities (restaurant, breakfast buffet), so amenities are partially available but not fully reliable.

Provided amenities generally met guest expectations.

Well-kept with a variety of amenities including fitness options.

Good pricing for the facilities and services provided.

Mixed to positive: one review explicitly states 'Value for money' and several cite good location and breakfast; however some guests felt offers were not honored and that condition reduced perceived value.

Noted as good value for the price, especially given the location.

Mixed feedback regarding room sizes and service speed relative to price.