FLAMENCO URBAN STAY vs Similar Hotels

Mixed to negative: several comments about rooms being dark or small, inability to open windows, occasional insects, broken shower fittings, basic TVs and some key/access problems.

Reviewers mentioned issues with room quality such as noise, lack of windows, and double decker beds.

Good views and spacious rooms noted, though some rooms described as small.

Many guests report the hotel is generally clean with daily housekeeping, but there are occasional issues (flies, small bugs on surfaces, and some water leakage from the shower) mentioned in several reviews.

Multiple reviews indicated cleanliness issues, like filthy toilets and stained bedsheets.

Multiple reviews mention unclean sheets and bathrooms.

Convenient for Jakarta attractions and public transport (close to Monas and main bus/train links), though a few guests noted limited nearby amenities and difficult car access because of local roads/construction.

The location is praised in several reviews for centrality and accessibility.

Many reviews comment positively on the location's convenience.

Consistently praised across reviews: staff described as very helpful, professional and accommodating (frequent mentions of Nabila/Nebila and attentive reception/housekeeping).

Numerous comments highlighted the friendliness and helpfulness of the staff.

Friendly staff and helpful services highlighted in several reviews.

Mixed impressions: one strong praise calling the buffet delicious, but other reviews report limited variety, small portions and hygiene concerns when breakfast is served.

Food offerings received mixed reviews, with some appreciating the Asian breakfast but others not.

Breakfast mentioned positively, but some variety issues reported.

Basic but functional: air conditioning works well and some rooms offer a sauna (positive), while in-room entertainment is basic (non‑Smart TV) and other amenities are modest.

Several amenities mentioned as positive but others noted a lack of functional features, like mirrors.

Some amenities mentioned positively, but also noted a lack of certain items.

Frequently described as good or cheap value — guests note a strong price-to-quality ratio and satisfactory daily housekeeping for the rate.

Most reviews find that the hotel offers good value considering the price.

Value for money perceived as good in most reviews.