
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
8.6Rooms were spacious but generally dated with issues such as low water pressure and noise.
Cleanliness
8.1Several guests noted cleanliness issues, including dirty floors and lack of maintenance.
Location
10.0The location was consistently praised for being close to parks and food options.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.


Christchurch, NZ
0.14 km (0.09 mi) from original


What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.3/10Daffodil Apartments
8.5/10Aalton Motel
9/10Deans Bush Motel
8.7/10Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.1Rooms were described as clean and modern, but some complaints about size.
Daffodil Apartments
8.0Rooms were generally comfortable and spacious, but some described them as dated.
Aalton Motel
8.6Rooms were spacious but generally dated with issues such as low water pressure and noise.
Deans Bush Motel
8.6Rooms were mostly comfortable, though some issues with temperature were mentioned.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.1Clean and tidy, though one review mentioned issues with cleanliness.
Daffodil Apartments
8.0Many reviews praised cleanliness, though a few mentioned issues like small shower space and water spreading.
Aalton Motel
8.1Several guests noted cleanliness issues, including dirty floors and lack of maintenance.
Deans Bush Motel
8.3Generally clean and tidy rooms mentioned; however, room stuffiness was noted.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.8Central location mentioned as a strong positive.
Daffodil Apartments
9.0Multiple reviews highlighted the great location, close to restaurants and attractions.
Aalton Motel
10.0The location was consistently praised for being close to parks and food options.
Deans Bush Motel
9.1Multiple reviews praised the location for its proximity to shopping and convenience.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.7Friendly and accommodating staff mentioned multiple times.
Daffodil Apartments
9.0Staff were consistently described as very friendly, accommodating, and providing excellent service.
Aalton Motel
10.0Staff were frequently described as friendly and accommodating, providing good customer service.
Deans Bush Motel
9.1Staff were described as exceptionally friendly and helpful.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
—Daffodil Apartments
—Aalton Motel
—Deans Bush Motel
—Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.1Restaurant quality rated well, though some complaints about beverage options.
Daffodil Apartments
8.5No specific comments on food, assumed standard for this hotel tier.
Aalton Motel
9.6No specific mentions, thus considered standard quality for this hotel tier.
Deans Bush Motel
8.6Standard quality for this hotel tier.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.2Basic amenities were noted as limited but acceptable.
Daffodil Apartments
8.0Reviewers mentioned the kitchenette and basic amenities, but some features like shower design were criticized.
Aalton Motel
7.6Amenities such as the pool and kitchen equipment were often mentioned as lacking functionality.
Deans Bush Motel
8.6Basic amenities provided; overall satisfactory experience.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
8.3Generally viewed as good value, but some reviews suggest better options.
Daffodil Apartments
9.0Value was appreciated, especially for a convenient location and clean rooms.
Aalton Motel
9.1Guests felt it provided reasonable value, though some amenities were outdated.
Deans Bush Motel
8.6Satisfied with the value provided for the price, despite some limitations.
Grand Riccarton Hotel
Mandeville ReserveDaffodil Apartments
Mandeville ReserveAalton Motel
Brockworth Street Art GalleryDeans Bush Motel
Riccarton Bush