Royal Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were described as simple and needing upgrades, with noise issues.

Rooms dirty, old and damaged, lacking privacy.

Room was hot with malfunctioning air conditioning and poor lighting.

Rooms described as basic and sometimes hot, with some complaints about noise.

Several reviews mention issues with cleanliness and upkeep.

Filthy dirty. Needs total refurbishment.

Multiple instances of uncleanliness noted, including dirty glass container and mouse droppings.

Some reviews mention cleanliness positively, but issues like a clogged toilet and outdated conditions impacted the score.

Guests appreciated the central location and proximity to markets.

Good location, very central.

Direct access to local attractions but limited parking.

Multiple reviews highlighted the convenience of the location near shops and attractions.

The staff was described as warm, friendly, and helpful across multiple reviews.

Service was standard quality for this hotel tier.

Staff described as very friendly, but service quality affected by issues with room amenities.

Staff were consistently praised for being friendly and helpful.

Food and beverage access was limited; some guests had issues.

Limited offerings; missing advertised amenities.

Not specifically mentioned, assumed standard quality for this hotel tier.

Good breakfast noted, but lacks variety in options mentioned.

Amenities were generally considered basic; improvements are needed.

Basic amenities needed updating and repair.

Limited amenities noted, specifically with parking and functioning air conditioning.

Amenities like scooter rental and rooftop area were mentioned positively.

Value was recognized, but some felt it was reflective of the facility's condition.

Not worth the price considering the state of the hotel.

Paid for a double bed and experienced multiple issues.

Given the prices, the overall value received was positively noted.