Premier Inn London Stratford vs Similar Hotels

Beds and showers repeatedly described as comfortable and good; however some guests reported issues with warm rooms, faulty or noisy air conditioning, musty ventilation and lack of a minibar/fridge in some rooms.

Rooms reported as spacious with good design and well-equipped bathrooms by many guests; some issues with air conditioning performance and occasional maintenance faults slightly reduce the score.

Rooms were spacious and comfortable, with some mentions of temperature control issues.

Rooms were generally comfortable, though one review mentioned issues with noise.

Multiple reviews explicitly describe rooms and the hotel as very clean and well kept; several guests praised cleanliness and tidy rooms.

Mixed reports: several guests praise clean rooms and bathrooms, while at least one review describes very poor cleanliness in WC/shower; overall slightly below target due to those negative reports.

Rooms were reported to be clean and well presented.

Several reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, indicating rooms were not well cleaned.

Consistently praised for being central and right by Lübeck Hbf/ZOB with easy access to the old town — location repeatedly described as 'top' or perfect for city trips, though some noise from trains/buses was noted.

Located on an industrial estate: convenient for driving and public transport links (bus stop nearby) but criticized for being somewhat remote from the town centre and on a main road; overall location sentiment is mixed-to-negative.

Convenient location with easy access to transport links.

Multiple reviews praised the excellent location for transport and nearby attractions.

Mixed reports: some guests mentioned friendly, good reception while others reported unfriendly or curt check-in staff and rigid check-in handling.

Staff frequently described as friendly and helpful across reviews; some maintenance requests were not resolved but general service interactions are positive, supporting an above-average score.

Staff were described as friendly and helpful, with positive interactions noted.

Some reviews noted slow service, but overall service was described as friendly.

Breakfast often described as good or excellent in quality, but several guests complained about limited product quality (e.g., packaged scrambled egg impression) and queues for coffee.

Breakfast is repeatedly described as very good and plentiful; limited restaurant menu and occasional crowding at peak times are minor negatives but overall F&B (especially breakfast) is a strong point.

Breakfast was noted as basic with suggestions for more variety.

Breakfast was mentioned as good, but with some concerns about variety.

Amenities are basic: breakfast offered and generally good, but complaints include no evening bar/restaurant at times, limited coffee machines causing queues, and AC problems in some rooms.

Breakfast offering and hotel bar receive praise, parking is available but often paid/limited and some rooms lacked a refrigerator; AC control and noisy ventilation noted as negatives for amenities.

Amenities were generally considered satisfactory, though some improvements could be made.

Amenities like a bar and comfortable beds were positively noted.

Overall good value noted for location and comfortable rooms; some guests felt breakfast items appeared low-cost and could be fresher, slightly lowering perceived value.

Several guests mention paid parking, perceived high prices in high season and occasional poor price-quality ratio; value is seen as slightly below expectations.

Good value considering location and overall experience.

The price was mentioned as high in some reviews, indicating room for consideration.