Premier Inn Shrewsbury Town Centre vs Similar Hotels

Rooms frequently described as modern, spacious and comfortable with good bathrooms and beds — strong positive sentiment for room quality.

Rooms were described as comfortable, but a few reviews suggested some rooms were small or dated.

A couple of fittings in the bathroom were a bit off; room was clean but had issues.

Rooms were noted to be dated and uncomfortable in some cases, leading to mixed reviews.

Repeated comments: rooms described as 'spacious and clean', 'tip top clean', 'sauber', 'tiszta' — overall strong cleanliness sentiment.

Generally noted as clean, but some reviews mentioned rooms being a little dated.

Black mould in the shower and carpets were filthy.

Many mentions of stains and dirt throughout the hotel led to a negative perception of cleanliness.

Location praised as convenient for Rosenheim/center and near the station; some notes that city center can be a 15–30 minute walk — generally good location.

Multiple mentions of a great location close to the town and lovely walks.

Excellent location close to train station and town center.

The hotel is well-located, with most reviews highlighting this as a positive aspect.

Service is generally friendly and helpful (staff praised, reception helped with parking), but some guests reported a less attentive reception and problems handling a twin-room request — mixed but overall positive.

Many reviews praised the friendly and helpful staff.

Staff were really friendly and helpful, consistently mentioned as a positive.

Staff were described as friendly and helpful, with positive experiences mentioned.

Breakfast repeatedly praised ('very good bread', 'super breakfast', 'wide selection') — strong positive sentiment for F&B, though limited direct comment on other food options.

Breakfast received particularly high praise for quality.

Breakfast was generally good, but some meals could be improved.

No breakfast service available detracted from the perceived quality of food and beverage options.

Mixed: on-site underground parking and in-building supermarket are positives, but multiple guests noted no minibar/fridge and parking can be paid/full — amenities somewhat lacking.

Adequate amenities noted, though some guests mentioned noise issues.

Amenities were good, but some areas needed improvement.

Lack of breakfast and various malfunctioning facilities contributed to a low perception of amenities.

Several comments call price 'acceptable' and note good breakfast included as value; paid parking reduces perceived value for some guests.

Considered fair for the services offered, particularly the breakfast.

Great value for money stay, especially with breakfast included.

Overall value is questioned due to issues experienced during the stay, like paying for parking.