Premier Inn Thirsk vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described variably: several guests reported large, comfortable rooms and good beds/showers, while a few noted small rooms in some cases—overall positive with some variability.

Rooms noted as comfortable and pleasant.

Rooms were described as cozy but issues reported with size and heating.

Reviewer noted the room was 'so comfortable' (positive on comfort); limited additional details provided.

Multiple reviews explicitly praise cleanliness and well-kept rooms ('sehr sauberes Zimmer', 'cleanliness' noted as a step up from average).

Clean and well-maintained rooms frequently mentioned.

Overall cleanliness was praised, but some noted small bathrooms.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Consistently praised as very central and close to the main station and cathedral ('in unmittelbarer Nähe zum Bahnhof', '5 minute walk to the station and cathedral').

Great location with easy access to town center.

Guests frequently mentioned great location and easy access.

Reviewer described the location as 'Perfect location' indicating very positive sentiment.

Mixed mentions: several comments note helpful and friendly staff at check-in/out, but there are specific negative incidents (rude receptionist, night porter complaint, and a reported double charge without refund) that lower the score.

Consistently praised for friendly and helpful hosts.

Many reviews highlighted friendly and helpful staff.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast receives positive mentions ('Good breakfast', 'Gemütlich gestalteter Frühstücksraum'), but few detailed comments beyond that.

Breakfast consistently praised for quality and choice.

Food quality was frequently highlighted as excellent.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Amenities are inconsistent in reviews: some rooms had fridges and A/C and praised (fridge noted in some), while others lacked A/C or fridge; breakfast area and storage were appreciated.

Standard amenities for this hotel tier, with additional refreshments.

Some amenities like heating and seating were lacking; better upkeep needed.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Explicitly called excellent value in multiple reviews ('best value for money', 'unbeatable for the price').

Guests felt it was excellent value based on their experience.

Generally good value, but some felt prices were high for services.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.