STILE Downtown Los Angeles vs Similar Hotels

The room exceeded expectations and had good amenities.

Rooms described as basic, small, dark or cramped (quad rooms particularly small), with thin/uncomfortable beds and occasional odor issues; some rooms are fine but variability is high.

Rooms are often described as comfortable, spacious with great bathrooms and character, but several comments mention small or dark rooms, street-noise and small bathrooms in some units.

Compliments on space and amenities, but notes on maintenance issues affect the perception.

The room was clean and well-staffed, but sound pollution was an issue.

Mixed reports: several guests noted smells (urine, feet), dirty carpet in quad rooms, pool debris and items left in rooms — cleanliness inconsistent across rooms.

Multiple reviewers explicitly praise cleanliness (e.g., 'La propreté du lieu est irréprochable', 'clean'); one mention of a sewage issue, but overall cleanliness is reported as very good.

There were mentions of cleanliness being problematic in some reviews, particularly one that highlighted filthy curtains and cockroaches.

Nice location with minimal issues.

Centrally located and convenient for downtown activities; some guests mentioned street noise and visible homelessness nearby, but overall location is a strong positive.

Many reviewers praise the central location and walking access to attractions and dining; a minority note it can feel far from some central areas or that the immediate neighborhood can be seedy with homelessness/urine smell—overall location sentiment is very positive but mixed.

Mixed sentiment with positive comments about convenience, but concerns about safety in the area were expressed.

The staff were very helpful and attentive.

Consistently praised: multiple reviews call out welcoming, helpful and friendly staff (noah, reception, valet, bartenders) and attentive service at the rooftop and lobby.

Service is frequently highlighted as excellent, helpful and hardworking ('staff were excellent', 'staff super-helpful', 'very patient and sympa'); a few isolated reports of unfriendly staff or slow restaurant service, but overall service sentiment is strongly positive.

Several reviews highlighted the kindness of the staff, although there were some mentions of slow service.

The coffee offered in the room was expired, though staff addressed it promptly.

Cocktails and rooftop service receive positive mentions, but breakfast is often criticized as low-quality, cold or overpriced; overall F&B is mixed leaning slightly positive for drinks/venue.

The roof terrace restaurant and food are explicitly praised ('great food at the roof terrace'); there are occasional service slowdowns and temporary closures due to filming, but overall F&B is well regarded.

There was no breakfast included, which disappointed some guests, affecting this rating.

Great rooftop bar and pool facilities.

Rooftop pool, stylish lobby and common spaces are frequently praised and a key draw; however some in-room amenities (hair dryer, kettle, reliable mini-fridge, gym) are lacking or inconsistent.

Rooftop restaurant, pool/bar and characterful public spaces are praised; however filming during some stays limited access to main restaurant and gym, and parking/valet issues were noted.

Some positive feedback on room layout and facilities, but comments about the lack of activities were noted.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Perceived as overpriced by several guests given room quality, parking fees and breakfast cost/quality — many say 'you get what you pay for' or feel charges (parking, valet) are high.

Mixed sentiment: some call it 'great value' and 'luxury for a nice price', while others describe the hotel as 'very expensive' and criticize high parking/valet costs—net sentiment below the overall target.

Overall positive sentiment about value for the price paid.