Richmond Hotel Sapporo Ekimae vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as small and some mention of issues with facilities.

Generally positive comments about room comfort, with some remarks on room size.

Some reviews noted that rooms were small and equipment outdated, affecting the overall room quality perception.

Mixed sentiments; some mentioned room size but noted dated interiors.

Mixed sentiment noted; some comments suggest cleanliness was good, but not all rooms met expectations.

Mixed reviews about cleanliness; there were issues with mold in the kettle.

General consensus on cleanliness was positive, but there were concerns about the smell of smoke in a non-smoking room.

Several mentions of unclean bed sheets and dated rooms.

Location praised for being near transport and attractions.

The location is described as very convenient and close to transport links.

Hotel is praised for its central location, walking distance from Sapporo station.

Multiple reviews praised the hotel's convenient location for sightseeing and transportation.

Staff received positive remarks for being courteous and accommodating.

Guests consistently praised staff for their friendliness and helpfulness.

Staff received multiple mentions for being friendly and helpful.

Staff were generally described as friendly and accommodating.

Breakfast options were well-received, indicating satisfactory quality.

Breakfast options were appreciated, particularly new offerings.

Breakfast was mentioned positively; however, some specific dishes were found lacking.

Breakfast received positive feedback for quality.

Amenities are well-received, with complimentary items available.

Amenities like washing machines received praise for convenience.

Onsen and breakfast were mentioned positively, though some amenities (like room size) were critiqued.

A lack of sufficient amenities such as drinking water was highlighted.

Good value for pricing as mentioned by multiple guests.

Guests find the offerings fair for the price, although some amenities could be improved.

General feedback indicates good value, although some expressed that certain facilities were lacking.

Overall perceived as good value despite some issues.