PS 2 Resort Phuket Patong - SHA Plus vs Similar Hotels

Several guests report basic or tired rooms, lack of furniture or kettle, thin walls and old fittings ('достаточно старый отель', 'номера простые', 'no kettle', 'on entend tout').

Multiple positive mentions (comfortable rooms, a praised honeymoon room), but some comments about the exterior/appearance being dated or 'tired' create a mixed-but-above-average impression.

Mixed sentiments; some mentioned issues with room amenities and old equipment.

Some rooms were noted as outdated but well-maintained.

Multiple guests explicitly praise room cleaning and overall cleanliness (e.g., 'прекрасная уборка', 'very clean', 'propreté'), though a few mentioned odors or a slightly dirty room at times.

Some mentions of bathroom doors left open and a generally 'tired/dark' feeling suggest cleanliness/privacy issues in parts of the property.

Several reviews mentioned serious hygiene problems and cleanliness issues in certain rooms.

The rooms were described as clean and comfortable.

Location is consistently highlighted as a strong point (close to Patong beach, central, near services and Chabad); many guests praised proximity to beach and center.

Several guests note a very good location (near Patong beach); location is highlighted as a strong point.

Many reviewers appreciated the strategic location near tourist spots and amenities.

Multiple reviews highlighted great location near the beach and restaurants.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and professional ('excellent staff', 'very friendly', 'personnel professionnel'), with one or two mentions of unhelpful reception as an exception.

Consistently praised across reviews: receptionists and staff described as very friendly, attentive and helpful; multiple guests report staff solved problems and provided excellent service.

Numerous reviews praised the staff, especially for their helpfulness and kindness.

Staff were consistently praised for being friendly and helpful.

Few on-site F&B options reported (absence of bar/buffet noted), guests relied on outside options; minor comments about laundry odor and no kettle in rooms affecting in-room F&B comfort.

Specific comment that breakfast quality is only average relative to price; no strong positive F&B mentions elsewhere.

Positive mentions about complimentary drinks and accessibility to food options.

Positive comments on the quality and variety of food.

Pool and garden are frequently praised ('nice pool', 'בריכת שחייה מאוד טובה'), but there are gaps (no bar/buffet, limited in-room kettles, some facilities limited).

Pool and pool view repeatedly praised (described as beautiful and 'revelation'), indicating strong amenities for relaxation.

Amenities are decent, though the absence of a lift and some issues with room cleanliness were noted.

Basic amenities were available, with some reviews noting good pool and breakfast options.

Mixed signals: several guests felt price was high or not good value ('цена не стоила', 'Preisleistung war ... nicht zufriedenstellend'), while others felt it was reasonable for location and facilities.

Mixed sentiment on value: one explicit comment says breakfast quality is mediocre for the price, suggesting value is perceived below average by some guests.

General consensus indicates good value for the price, especially for the location.

Generally good value for service and comfort offered.