Sai Rougn Residence - SHA Extra Plus vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are mixed: some suites with kitchens are appreciated, but many guests report old furniture, hard mattresses, and shower problems requiring refurbishment.

Mixed feedback due to reports of uncomfortable beds and noise issues.

Basic and tired room quality noted, with some noise issues.

Inconsistent reports on room conditions, with some noting issues.

Mixed reports: several guests praise excellent cleaning, while multiple reviews mention old or torn linens and occasional lack of cleanliness in rooms.

Multiple reviews mentioned unclean rooms and insufficient cleaning.

Room cleanliness noted positively, but basic and tired looking rooms mentioned.

Some reviews indicated cleanliness issues and poor room conditions.

Frequently cited as a strength: quiet, tucked-away spot with good views and proximity to services, though many note a steep climb and distance from Patong.

The location was frequently highlighted as convenient and well-placed.

Good location noted multiple times, though close to a noisy main road.

Multiple reviews praised the hotel's great location.

Generally praised — staff repeatedly described as friendly and helpful, though isolated reports note a rude receptionist and some front-desk issues.

Many reviews praised the staff for being friendly and helpful.

Friendly and responsive staff mentioned, suggesting good service.

Staff were described as friendly and helpful.

Mixed feedback: restaurant and in-room cooking are praised by some, while breakfast options are criticized (e.g., only eggs) and F&B quality is uneven.

Consistently negative reviews on the quality of breakfast.

Average breakfast mentioned, limiting overall satisfaction.

Breakfast and dining options received mixed reviews.

Strong amenity sentiment: the pool and on-site restaurant are highlighted positively; some units offer kitchen facilities and a shuttle service to the beach.

Some positive mentions of the pool, though issues like noise were noted.

Lovely pool and pool bar mentioned, but limited facilities for kids.

Hotel features like the pool were positively mentioned.

Mixed value perception: a few guests find the price acceptable, but recurring comments about ageing facilities and maintenance issues reduce perceived value.

Overall positive sentiment regarding pricing in relation to services provided.

Good value for money suggested but impacted by road noise.

Positive sentiments overall, though some felt it could improve.