Hotel 88 Grogol by WH vs Similar Hotels

Mixed feedback: rooms described as somewhat small with older furniture; bathrooms need upgrades and some amenities (e.g., shattaf) are missing.

Mixed to negative: several comments about rooms being dark or small, inability to open windows, occasional insects, broken shower fittings, basic TVs and some key/access problems.

Guests found the rooms comfortable and well-maintained.

Generally reported as clean, but several mentions of worn towels, an unclean kettle and minor repair needs reduce the score.

Many guests report the hotel is generally clean with daily housekeeping, but there are occasional issues (flies, small bugs on surfaces, and some water leakage from the shower) mentioned in several reviews.

Many reviews mention cleanliness positively, indicating rooms were clean.

Very strong — repeatedly noted as adjacent to Central Park mall and close to shops, restaurants and transport; extremely convenient for shopping.

Convenient for Jakarta attractions and public transport (close to Monas and main bus/train links), though a few guests noted limited nearby amenities and difficult car access because of local roads/construction.

Multiple reviews highlight the location as convenient and close to various attractions.

Consistently praised: warm, polite and helpful staff, quick check-in and attentive reception.

Consistently praised across reviews: staff described as very helpful, professional and accommodating (frequent mentions of Nabila/Nebila and attentive reception/housekeeping).

The staff is frequently described as friendly and helpful, with good service quality.

Breakfast widely praised as fantastic, though mostly Indonesian offerings; one suggestion to add an Arabic item (e.g., foul).

Mixed impressions: one strong praise calling the buffet delicious, but other reviews report limited variety, small portions and hygiene concerns when breakfast is served.

Food quality was good but some criticized the options available.

Good on-site amenities (mall access, cafes, restaurants, supermarket, gym), though the pool closure during a filming event and some maintenance issues affected perception.

Basic but functional: air conditioning works well and some rooms offer a sauna (positive), while in-room entertainment is basic (non‑Smart TV) and other amenities are modest.

Amenities like the cafe and pool were appreciated but had some minor issues.

Explicitly mentioned as good value; guests feel the location and services justify the price.

Frequently described as good or cheap value — guests note a strong price-to-quality ratio and satisfactory daily housekeeping for the rate.

Good value for the price according to several guests, given the location and quality.