Holiday Inn Express Pune Pimpri by IHG vs Similar Hotels

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Rooms are described as clean and well furnished, but several guests complained about noisy air conditioning, awkward light switches, and privacy issues with frosted-glass bathrooms.

Rooms are described as old, indicating a need for improvement.

No view from the room.

Rooms were clean.

Rooms are frequently described as clean with new furniture, but there are repeated mentions of missing toiletries and occasional housekeeping lapses.

Guests noted the hotel was clean and comfortable.

Bathrooms need renovation, tissue papers were like leftovers, not new.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Location is repeatedly cited as a strong point (convenient for business/customers); one reviewer noted a less desirable surrounding, but overall location sentiment is positive.

The hotel is in a good location, which was favorably mentioned.

Proximity to the stadium. Can be better if the other gate towards Baner road is open.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed reports: many reviewers praise friendly, helpful staff and quick check-in, while others report inattentive or rude staff, a rude manager, and poorly trained junior staff leading to chaotic front desk operations.

Service was standard for this hotel tier, though extra pillows were not provided.

Unresponsive front desk. Staff is rude.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Strongly positive: food and breakfast receive high praise, the restaurant accommodated dietary needs (e.g., Jain meals), and several guests described the food as excellent.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Food was excellent.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Property is well appointed with good communal areas and a restaurant, but issues include a cold swimming pool, poor lounge selection, lack of a room service menu, and noisy AC affecting comfort.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Consistently criticized: multiple reviewers called the hotel overpriced, reported billing inconsistencies and exchange-rate problems, and felt the price did not match perceived value.

Decent value for money, as mentioned in the reviews.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.