Red Roof Motor Inn vs Similar Hotels

Most reviews describe the rooms as clean and comfortable, although some mention issues with odor.

Rooms are spacious, often renovated, and have comfortable beds and features (kitchenette, fireplace, jacuzzi shower) but several guests note dated/tired decor, old equipment (TV/fridge), occasional lack of hot water or drainage problems.

Rooms were comfortable but criticism regarding outdated features and locked windows was noted.

Rooms described as clean, comfortable, with some modern upgrades.

Many reviews mention cleanliness positively, but there were a few complaints about smells and need for better upkeep.

Mixed cleanliness: several guests reported generally clean rooms, but there are multiple negative mentions (odd smells, hair on bathroom floor, spiderwebs, stained chairs, moldy coffee filter, shower drainage issues and missing towels) that lower this rating.

Overall cleanliness was noted as comfortable and fairly clean, but some reviews mentioned outdated plumbing and maintenance issues.

Overall sentiment indicates cleanliness is generally good, but some issues were mentioned.

Multiple reviews praised the convenient location and quiet area.

Location is frequently highlighted positively: short walk to town/downtown, nice mountain views from rooms and balcony, quiet area and convenient parking; overall a strong location for visitors.

Location was generally praised, with convenience to nearby attractions.

Multiple reviews mention convenient location and access.

The owner was noted as friendly and accommodating, providing good service during check-in.

Service is consistently praised: staff are described as friendly, helpful, accommodating (helped with moves, provided towels/coffee pot on request, professional with guests). One housekeeping lapse (discarded a guest's dog toy) is noted but overall service is a strong point.

Most reviews positively highlighted the friendly and helpful staff.

Many reviews highlight friendly and accommodating staff.

Some reviews mention the quality of food supplied in the rooms being better than expected.

Limited F&B commentary: no on-site dining mentioned and one notable negative regarding coffee supplies (moldy filter, insufficient condiments). Default limited offering with an instance of poor maintenance.

Breakfast was mentioned in reviews, but overall experience was mixed regarding food availability.

No explicit mentions, assigned standard quality for this hotel tier.

Some amenities were noted, but there's room for improvement, especially regarding coffee and toiletries.

Amenities include kitchenette, fireplace, parking and Jacuzzi-style shower, and pet accommodation (sometimes with fee), but there are repeated issues: slow/nonexistent internet, unreliable TVs, old or small fridges, limited in-room trash and missing/basic coffee supplies.

Concerns about the closed pool and limited kitchen amenities in the family suite were expressed.

Guests appreciated the modern amenities, though some could be improved.

Guests found the pricing reasonable given the overall experience.

Value perceptions are mixed: many guests felt the price matched what was offered (large units, clean and comfortable), while others felt it lacked value compared to nearby alternatives and noted maintenance/amenity shortcomings.

Guests felt they received good value for the price, despite some complaints.

Reviews reflect good value for the price paid.