Fortune Park JPS Grand Rajkot - Member ITC Hotels' Group vs Similar Hotels

The room was clean and spacious with a comfortable king-size bed.

Shower had rusty hose.

Some positive notes about rooms but also complaints about cracks and issues.

Room comfortability praised, but reports of being 'little run down' and broken bathroom fixtures lower the room quality rating.

The hotel was clean, the room was nice and the bed was comfortable.

Room ambience was not good, Washroom was not clean as expected, toilet jet spray was leaking.

Several mentions of dirty bed linens, unclean rooms, and a generally dated look.

Rooms described as 'comfortable and clean' by some guests but bathroom accessories were reported broken (washbasin) indicating mixed cleanliness/maintenance.

A bit far from the airport but overall a nice property.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Positive comments about the location being close to the city center.

Several comments note a central/downtown location with everything nearby and convenient access; location sentiment is positive.

The service and staff were outstanding. Special mention: Topu and Ravi for being helpful and professional.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed reviews about service; many complaints regarding staff attitude and professionalism.

Multiple mentions of pleasant, very helpful and excellent staff, including assistance at check-in; overall service sentiment is strongly positive.

Breakfast was delicious with lots of varieties and special mention of outstanding food quality.

Simply ask one milk shake without ice cream / shake with dry fruit, because of long travelling and fasting. Unfortunately not available.

Consistently positive feedback regarding the restaurant and food quality.

Breakfast is repeatedly described as excellent and 'too good', giving food and beverage a positive rating.

Buffet should have more options, but overall amenities were satisfactory.

朝食にもっとオリエンタルメニューを準備してほしい，アメニティーに髭剃りを欲しい。

Lack of available amenities and disappointed by closed facilities.

Limited mentions; rooftop restaurant service was flagged as a negative (listed under cons), so amenities receive a modest score.

Generally good experience relative to cost, although the price should include all expected amenities.

Simply waste of money.

General feeling that it was not worth the price, but some positive notes on breakfast and service.

Multiple headlines and comments explicitly cite 'value for money' and 'perfect stay', indicating strong perceived value.