Shenzhen Lido Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as comfortable, good beds, modern contemporary design and appropriately sized for many guests; some issues noted (AC problems, one 3-person room smaller than usual).

The hotel is older, with mentions of the need for refurbishment.

Generally comfortable and spacious rooms reported; some rooms were described as lacking an open window or being slightly dusty/dank for longer stays.

Rooms are described as average and somewhat outdated but clean with useful amenities.

Multiple guests reported hair on beds, partially-stocked bathroom tissue and cigarette smell in common areas, indicating below-average cleanliness.

Some concerns regarding air quality and environment in the room.

Mixed reports: many guests described rooms as clean, but multiple complaints about dust, dankness, high humidity, mold/odors (including urine smell) lowered overall cleanliness perception.

Reviews indicate noticeable dirt and an outdated feel, suggesting poor maintenance.

Consistently praised as very close to the metro and central (easy access to Luohu/Hong Kong), only minor inconvenience noted (nearest entrance lacked an escalator).

Great location noted, with easy access to metro and central areas.

Excellent location repeatedly cited — next to the metro, Dongmen/Laojie station, Pedestrian Street and many shops/restaurants; extremely convenient for sightseeing and food.

The location is frequently praised for convenience and proximity to restaurants and the metro.

Several mentions of helpful and friendly staff (named staff praised, accommodating service, robot delivery), though one guest found a front desk person strict; overall positive service.

Friendly staff were mentioned positively in multiple reviews.

Consistently positive: several reviews mention friendly, outstanding counter staff and good customer service.

Staff are described as friendly and attentive, positively impacting the overall experience.

Breakfast variety was praised by some, but complaints include buffet being free for only one person and at least one guest unhappy with the restaurant.

Breakfast not tried yet, left open as a potential positive.

Negative: breakfast frequently criticized as limited, cold, greasy or unappealing; coffee and juice also mentioned as poor by several guests.

Breakfast options available but perceived as lacking quality ingredients.

Mixed mentions: robot room delivery and room service praised, but missing irons/rubbish bins and limited breakfast policy reduce the amenities score.

Some amenities like the spa mentioned as needing renewal.

Weak: washing facilities appear inadequate (too few/small machines, sometimes not working); reports of heavy dehumidifier use and smoking in corridors also detract from amenities.

Facilities like the pool and gym are reported to be worn and subpar.

Multiple guests explicitly called it value for money and reasonable price for the location and room size.

Reasonable pricing for the location.

Positive: multiple guests commented it was good value or worth the money given the price and central location.

Some feel the hotel is slightly overpriced given quality, but upgraded rooms add value.